Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Petron, Inc., 617 So. 2d 1358.
-
Noe v. Basile Police Department
103 So. 3d 689
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Webster’s defines ‘extraordinary’ as ‘going beyond what is usual, regular or customary.’” Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Jerry Noe v. Basile Police Department
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Webster‟s defines „extraordinary‟ as „going beyond what is usual, regular or customary.‟” Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Ella Mae Smith v. Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
City of Oakdale, ( (La.App.
-
Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTER
954 So. 2d 365
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
City of Oakdale, , ( (La.App.
-
City of Oakdale v. Smith
788 So. 2d 507
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In Johnson v. Petron, Incorporated, (La.App.
-
Clophus v. Taco Bell Corp./HotN'Now
732 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
[1] Furthermore, in Henry, 670 So.2d at 310 , ( citing Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Laumann v. Dulac Shipyard, Inc.
676 So. 2d 823
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Henry v. Gulf Coast Cas. Ins. Co.
670 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
*310 In Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Galeano v. Glazer Aluminum
668 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.1993); Johnson v. Petron, Incorp., (La.App.
- Barton v. Texas Industries 654 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Harge v. MCC Specialty Contractors, Inc.
650 So. 2d 425
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.
-
Debona v. Pawn
649 So. 2d 449
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
ANALYSIS OF THE LAW A. The "Extraordinary and Unusual" Criterion In Johnson v. Petron, Inc., writ denied, (1993), this court explained the legislature's 1989 amendment to La.R.S.
-
Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co.
627 So. 2d 1366
La. 1993
3d Cir.1993), writ denied, ; Johnson v. Petron, Inc., (La.App.