Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co., 618 So. 2d 874.

55 citing documents.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company La. 2025
Richard Laborde v. Aerial Crop Care, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land & La. 2022
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, More or Less, Located in St. Martin Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
art 2315 require that, where an individual’s property is damaged unlawfully by a tortfeasor for no good reason, the owner be compensated at least as fully as when his property is damaged by the state for a public purpose.”
Sicily Island Holdings, LLC v. United States Aviation Underwriters Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Juanita W. Fontenot and T. June Wilder v. Gilchrist Construction Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Duet v. Landry 250 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/10/06), , 773 ; Roman Catholic Church of Archdiocese of New Orleans v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. , , 876 (La.
Randall Vincent and Karen Vincent v. City of Iowa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Vincent v. City of Iowa 244 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. , , 879-80 (La.1993).
Bosley v. Oliphint Enters., LLC 244 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Succession of Watkins 206 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Moss v. Town of Rayville 181 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Kahl v. Luster, 11-2332 (La.App.
State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 110 So. 3d 1038 La. 2013
art. 2315: “Every act whatever of man that causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” This court has held “[o]ne injured through the fault of another is entitled to full indemnification for damages caused thereby.”
Kahl v. Luster 110 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
Angelo Sagnibene, Et Ux. v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Sagnibene v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 68 So. 3d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
McFadden v. Import One, Inc. 56 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Brian Bordelon, Jr. v. Affordable Movers, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., Frisby v. Mugnier, 06-2288 (La.App.
Bordelon v. Affordable Movers, LLC 22 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Frisby v. Mugnier, 06-2288 (La.App.
Frisby v. Mugnier 971 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Holzenthal v. SEWERAGE & WATER BD. OF NO 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Both parties, to some extent
Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging 902 So. 2d 361 La. 2005
this court addressed the issue of restoration costs under La.
Charles William Massie, III v. Z. David Deloach La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., 00-1596 (La.App.
Massie v. Deloach 896 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., 00-1596 (La.App.
Sandres J. Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Furthermore, the court did not buttress its instruction to the jury with the cornerstone of Louisiana damages law, “that the goals of our Civil Code and the 6
Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. 877 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hays v. State 856 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
Co., which involved tortious damage to immovable property, that "...
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrington 854 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the court noted that reasons personal to an owner are often the basis of a property damage award, which exceeds the property's value before it was damaged.
Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
It argues that this is in violation of the rule of Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. and its holding: Accordingly, we conclude that, as a general rule of thumb, when a person sustains property damage due to the fault of another, he is entitled to recover damages including the cost of restoration that has been or may be reasonably incurred, or, at his election, the difference between the val
Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc. 796 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
The trial court erred in awarding restoration damages that were not reasonable in relation to some objective benchmark associated with the property or a finding of "personal reasons"
North American Land Development v. Higginbotham 771 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Saden v. Kirby 759 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In support of their argument, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when property is damaged through the legal fault of another, the primary objective is to restore the property as nearly as possible to the state it was immediately preceding the damage.
McAshan v. Jack's Pest Control 782 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
the church sued the gas company for damages arising out of a fire in an apartment complex owned by the church.
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 731 So. 2d 240 La. 1999
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 715 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 709 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dual Drilling Co. v. MILLS EQUIPMENT INVS., INC. 705 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Tudor Chateau Creole Apartments Partnership v. D.A. Exterminating Co. 691 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In support of this argument, which they summarize as standing for the proposition that when a person’s property is damaged, he is entitled to cost of restoration or the difference between the value of the property before and after the harm.
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 657 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995