Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Picone v. Lyons, 601 So. 2d 1375.

28 citing documents.

Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
1981) (fundamental rights include: freedom of expression and association, the right to vote, the right to interstate travel, the right to privacy, the right to fairness in the criminal process, the right to fairness in procedures concerning governmental deprivations of life, liberty or property); see also, -77 (La.
Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
1981) (fundamental rights include: freedom of expression and association, the right to vote, the right to interstate travel, the right to privacy, the right to fairness in the criminal process, the right to fairness in procedures concerning governmental deprivations of life, liberty or property); See also, -77 (La.
John Hill and Nancy George, on Behalf of Their Daughter, Kayomoniqic George v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Succession of Ursin v. Board of Levee Commissioners 104 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Health Sciences Ctr., 04-2482, p. 15 (La.4/12/05)
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
which explicitly addresses the doctrine of laches, states, “Under the Louisiana legal system, there is no room for the common law doctrine of laches.” Citing article 3457, this court has previously concisely stated, “The common law doctrine of laches does not prevail in Louisiana and the legislature may create, shorten, lengthen or abolish prescriptive periods at its discretion.”
Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
court has held that there is no due process violation under the Louisiana 2 Constitution or the United States Constitution because “[i]nterruption of prescription for solidary obligors is rationally related to the state’s interest in providing full compensation to tort victims and holding defendants responsible for their delicts.”
Alcorn v. City of Baton Rouge 898 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
v. M.M.M., 98-0167, p. 3 (La.3/2/99)
New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New Orleans 876 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Perkins v. Willie 878 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Civ.Code articles 1799, 2324, 3463 and 3503
Pavich v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 780 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
v. M.M.M., 98-0167 (La.3/2/99)
Firefighters v. City of New Orleans 767 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Cory v. Cory 771 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 51 La. 2000
4th Cir.), reversed on other grounds
Battiste v. Jani King of New Orleans 753 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Songy v. Songy 738 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
“The common law doctrine of laches does not prevail in Louisiana and the legislature may create, shorten, lengthen or abolish prescriptive periods at its discretion.”
T.D. v. M.M.M. 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Picone v. Lyons, 92-0350 (La.7/1/92); , reh’g denied 9/3/92.
Td v. Mmm 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Picone v. Lyons, 92-0350 (La.7/1/92); , reh'g denied 9/3/92.
Terrel v. Perkins 704 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4th Cir.), reversed on other grounds
Hebard v. Dillon 699 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Payne v. Pedus Building Service Inc. 671 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.1992), reversed, on other grounds
Explained Gebhardt v. State 652 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4 Cir.1992), reversed on other grounds, : |sNeither Ray nor La.C.C.P.
Dubuclet v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Distinguished Benoit v. Devillier 649 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
laches was inapplicable because the underlying claim was delictual and thus, there was a prescriptive period provided.
Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Hosp. 634 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
Hendee Homes, Inc. v. Lee 614 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO 611 So. 2d 1383 La. 1993
(where defendants alleged to be solidary were added twelve years after filing of original petition).