Stiles v. K Mart Corp.
Stiles v. K Mart Corp., 597 So. 2d 1012 (La. 1992).
Cited by
- Cy Williams Versus Mathew Alexander, III and Roussel Farms, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- Derrick Mills Versus Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- Robert Broussard and R.J. Broussard General Contractors Inc. v. Multi-Chem Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- Patricia Settoon v. Juan Morales; Plant Performance Services LLC; and Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Berry v. Anco Insulations 273 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Riley Leblanc v. City of Abbeville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville 259 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Levy v. Lewis 219 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Opinion text
597 So.2d 1012 (1992) Muriel STILES v. K MART CORPORATION. No. 92-C-0373. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 1, 1992. *1013 PER CURIAM. The application is granted. When the record establishes that future medical expenses will be necessary and inevitable, the court should not reject an award of future medical expenses on the basis that the record does not provide the exact value of the necessary expenses, if the court can examine the record and determine from evidence of past medical expenses and other evidence a minimum amount that reasonable minds could not disagree will be required. La.Code of Civ. Proc. art. 2164. The judgment of the court of appeal as to future medical expenses is set aside, and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to fix an award for future medical expenses which the medical evidence established that plaintiff, more probably than not, will be required to incur. COLE, J., would deny the application.