Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 195.

189 citing documents.

Dore v. Brignac 791 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Leger v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 792 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Croker v. Reliance Nat. Indem. Co. 800 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Jie v. Certified Lloyds Plan 785 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Co., for the proposition that compliance with La.
Stewart v. Edwards 784 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Poe v. PPG Industries 782 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Dardar v. York 808 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hargrove v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 780 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Brandon v. Harper 775 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co. ., Harris v. Safeway Ins.
Thomas v. Safeway Ins. Co. 775 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
McGeorge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 771 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Walden v. Permanent General Assurance Corp. 774 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Aucoin v. ABC Insurance Co. 773 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Weeden v. Landmark American Ins. Co. 768 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Thigpen v. RPM Pizza, Inc. 772 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Courtney v. Sovereign Fire & Casualty Insurance 764 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., to support his argument that the UM rejections were not valid because the insurance policies, which were issued prior to the 1992 amendment, failed to offer UM coverage limits lower than the bodily injury limits.
Austin v. Western World Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In re Ronald Bankston & Lounges, Inc. 761 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Perez v. Progressive Ins. Co. 751 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Wilson v. Indemnity Underwriters Insurance Co. 751 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., that a UM rejection form must contain options disclosing UM coverage equal to bodily injury limits in the policy, UM coverage lower than those limits, or no UM coverage.
Evans v. Crowe 765 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Boullt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 739 La. 1999
Allen v. Integrated Health Services, Inc. 743 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Dardar v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co. 739 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Sutherland v. Babin 735 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Taylor v. Rowell 736 So. 2d 812 La. 1999
Trahan v. PRUDENTIAL PRO. & CAS. INS. 739 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Rogers v. Caston 732 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Plummer v. Allstate Insurance 738 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., that a UM rejection form must contain options disclosing: “UM coverage equal to bodily injury limits in the policy, UM coverage lower that [sic] those limits, or no UM coverage.” The supreme court then further held that “when an applicant elects to purchase only the minimum bodily injury limits allowable, t
Carnival Brands v. American Guarantee Ins. 726 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Cotton v. Credit General Insurance Co. 723 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-98 (La.1992); Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corporation, 94-2386, p.11-14 (La.App.
Perron v. Reliance Ins. Co. 733 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Savant v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 725 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Co., that a UM rejection form must contain options disclosing: "UM coverage equal to bodily injury limits in the policy, UM coverage lower that [sic] those limits, or no UM coverage."
George v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. 721 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Encalarde v. Bock 721 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Harris v. Safeway Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Horne v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 717 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Pellerin v. Thibodeaux 716 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Company, Banks v. Patterson Ins.
Hoey v. Shelter General Insurance 715 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Abshire v. Reliance National Indemnity Co. 711 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Anderson v. Oliver 705 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Maney v. Bennett 703 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Dronet v. Safeway Insurance Co. 703 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Co., Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So.2d [1126] at 1132[sic] [(La.1987)]; Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Paige v. Tucker 702 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Isaac v. Patterson Ins. Co. 702 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Richard v. Cormier 702 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Company, Banks v. Patterson Ins.
Williams v. Patterson Insurance Co. 700 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Riser v. Brown 699 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Co., agreed with the court in Uhrich v. National Fire Ins.
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Gowen 699 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Co., Washington v. Imperial Fire and Cas.