Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC., 612 So. 2d 7.

36 citing documents.

John Stewart Gentry and Diana Gentry Breen d/b/a Richland Farm Partnership v. Northeast Louisiana Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La., a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., (La.
Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, Inc. & Preferred Care … La. 2024
12/4/12), (quoting Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., (La.
Ashley-Roxanne N'Dakpri, Lynn Schofield, and Evangela Michelle Robertson v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology; Steve Young; in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
In fact, Ms. N' Dakpri does not dispute that she failed to exhaust her administrative remedy, rather she claims that administrative exhaustion should not be required of her because it would be impossible or futile, citing Daily Advertiser v. Trans -La, a Division of Atmos Energy Corp., ( La.
Acadiana Renal Physicians, a Medical Corporation v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. and Lafayette General … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
51:135, is one such specialized procedure); in accord Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., (holding that while the usual procedural vehicle for seeking review of the pretrial denial of exceptions would have been by supervisory writs, defendants were afforded an expedited right of appeal pursuant to La.R.S.
Westlawn Cemeteries, L.L.C. Versus The Louisiana Cemetery Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
See Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., (La.
Frith v. Southwest Ouachita Waterworks, Inc. 207 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La., a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., (La.
Henry v. Greater Ouachita Water Co. 207 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
(A Div. of Atmos Energy Corp.), (La.
Amer v. Roberts 184 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Division of Atmos *129 Energy Coloration
Town of Sterlington v. Greater Ouachita Water Co. 149 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp.
Paulsell v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 112 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Division of Atmos Energy Corporation
Opelousas Trust Authority v. Cleco Corp. 105 So. 3d 26 La. 2012
1 Cleco argued since plaintiffs seek reparation of alleged overcharges, and their claims should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Opelousas Trust Authority D/B/A Opelousas General Health System v. Cleco Corporation and Cleco Power, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
In support of its position that this case is a rate case that is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the LPSC, Cleco relies on the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
Opelousas Trust Authority v. Cleco Corp. 85 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In support of its position that this case is a rate case that is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the LPSC, Cleco relies on the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
Gordon v. Council of City of New Orleans 9 So. 3d 63 La. 2009
4 FACs are “widely-accepted rate making tools utilized to allow a utility to recoup fluctuating fuel costs on an ongoing basis.” Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp.
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
Gordon v. Council of the City of New Orleans 977 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Additionally, the Appellants have raised the following issues for review before this Court: and abdicate its duties as administrative adjudicator by failing to award refunds for overcharges flowed through ENO's fuel adjustment mechanism, and caused by ENO's violations of Council rules and orders, fundamental regulatory policy, and law; Whether the City Council improperly invoked "equity" in refu
Lowenburg v. Council of New Orleans 859 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
the Supreme Court relied on primary jurisdiction in holding a district could lacked subject matter jurisdiction where the crux of the dispute was a rate matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Louisiana Public Service Commission.
Capitol House Preserv. v. Perryman Consult 836 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Ethyl Corp. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc. 836 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp., the supreme court explained that "the manner in which plaintiffs couch their claims does not automatically vest jurisdiction in the district court; rather, the nature of the relief demanded is dispositive."
Blair v. Stalder 798 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, a Division of Atmos Energy Corp., n. 14 (La.1993); Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 258 La.
Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La., a Division of Atmos Energy Corporation, -31 (La.1993).
Entergy Gulf States v. LPSC 730 So. 2d 890 La. 1999
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, 92-0988 & 92-1001, (citing Gulf States Utils.
Entergy Gulf States v. PUBLIC SERV. COM'N 726 So. 2d 870 La. 1999
quoting La Const. Art. IV, Sec.
Global Tel Link, Inc. v. LA. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N 707 So. 2d 28 La. 1998
v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n, Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La., a Div. of Atmos Energy Corp.
Michael v. City of Minden 704 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
*413 In support of their argument, in which the supreme court found that the Louisiana Public Service Commission’s (“LPSC”) allowance of monthly fuel cost adjustments pursuant to adjustment clauses does not constitute rate making in the traditional sense, because such adjustments enter into effect without a prior reasonableness review.
Wilson v. La. Safety Ass'n of Timberman 690 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Moore v. Roemer, supra at p. 79 ; (La.
Gulf States Util. v. La. Pub. Serv. Com'n 689 So. 2d 1337 La. 1997
Gulf States even concedes the Commission's authority to disapprove retroactively costs passed through a fuel adjustment clause, [hereinafter Daily Advertiser.
Williams v. Midwest Employers Cas. Co. 669 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Tomas v. Conco Food Distributors 666 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State Ex Rel. Ieyoub v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Dover, Inc. 665 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
See Board of Comm'nrs of the Orleans Levee District v. Connick, 94-3161, p. 2 (La.1995); , , 15 n. 14 (La.1993) ( citations omitted ).
Showboat Star Partnership v. Connick 654 So. 2d 1082 La. 1995
15 n. 14 (La.1993) (citations omitted), “upon granting writs, the entire case is before this court.” For the reasons set forth in our opinion in Board of Comm’nrs, 94-CA-3161, supra, we hereby reverse the decision of the trial court in this case granting the plaintiff a preliminary injunction against the district at
Bellard v. LOUISIANA CORR. & IND. SCHOOL 647 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
See Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, Etc.
Midboe v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Empl. 646 So. 2d 351 La. 1994
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La, Etc., Board of Com'rs v. Commission on Ethics, 484 So.2d at 849 .
Gulf States Utilities v. PSC 633 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La (A Division of Atmos Energy Corp. d/b/a Energas Co.), Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Louisiana Pub.
Kelty v. Brumfield 633 So. 2d 1210 La. 1994
Bonomo v. Louisiana Downs, Inc., (La.