Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gagnard v. Baldridge, 612 So. 2d 732.
- Elizabeth Hill and John G. Hill v. Darcy Franklin, East Baton Rouge Parish School System and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Justin Dewane Pelle v. Eric Munos and GEICO Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
-
Jake Chimento v. Kdm electric/rapides Parish Work Release
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
(“Double recovery would be in the nature of exemplary or punitive damages which are not allowable under Louisiana law unless expressly provided for by statute”).
-
Chimento v. KDM Electric/Rapides Parish Work Release
229 So. 3d 69
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(“Double recovery would be in the nature of exemplary or punitive damages which are not allowable under Louisiana law unless expressly provided for by statute”).
-
Tommie Hebert, Et Ux. v. J. Oran Richard
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2 OFFSET The Heberts claim that the trial court erred in allowing Industrial to claim an entire offset/credit without consideration of the supreme court’s
-
Hebert v. Richard
206 So. 3d 251
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
laOFFSET The Heberts claim that the trial court erred in allowing Industrial to claim an entire offset/credit without consideration of the supreme court’s
-
Eddie Hoffman v. 21st Century North America Insurance Company and Carolyn Elzy
209 So. 3d 702
La. 2015
“Double recovery would be in the nature of exemplary or punitive damages, which are not allowable under Louisiana law unless expressly provided by statute.”
- Sylvester Harris v. Olivier's Contractors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Harris v. Olivier's Contractors 155 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Kenneth Dale Kelly, Et Ux. v. Boise Building Solutions La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Kelly v. Boise Building Solutions 92 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC
85 So. 3d 629
La. 2012
(“Double recovery would be in the nature of exemplary or punitive damages which are not allowable under Louisiana law unless expressly provided for by statute”).
-
J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co.
72 So. 3d 862
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Thus, the recovery under the Policy, if any, “is subject to offset by payments received under flood insurance policies.” See, Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company, 05-2496, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (“Louisiana law does not allow for double recovery of the same element of damages.”); (“Double recovery would be in the nature of exemplary or punitive damages which are not allowable under Louisiana law unless expressly provided for by statute.”).
-
Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co.
60 So. 3d 1220
La. 2011
Co., 2005-2496 (La.10/17/06), ().
-
Kennedy-Fagan v. Estate of Graves
993 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Albert , : A wrongdoer should not be required to pay twice for the same elements of damages.
-
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
980 So. 2d 654
La. 2008
See, Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company, 05-2496, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), , 622 ("Louisiana law does not allow for double recovery of the same element of damages."); (La.
- Larry Dupuy v. Billy L. Wiley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Dupuy v. Wiley 942 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company
940 So. 2d 620
La. 2006
we stated: A wrongdoer should not be required to pay twice for the same elements of damages.
- McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
- Julie Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Floyd Boone, Jr. v. Mid-State Marketing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Boone v. Mid-State Marketing
867 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 8/27/03) , ; (La.
- Robinson v. North American Salt Co. 865 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Belaire v. Don Shetler Olds Buick Chevrolet 847 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Scott v. Dauterive Hosp. Corp.
851 So. 2d 1152
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
for its discussion regarding the prohibition against requiring a tortfeasor to pay twice for the same elements of damages.
- Patterson v. Martin Forest Products, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
Eichelberger v. Sidney
771 So. 2d 863
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
despite the parallel tests for a LeBrane claim and a worker's compensation claim under La.
-
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.
758 So. 2d 124
La. 2000
See Roberts, 634 So.2d at 344 ; Atchison, supra; Puchner v. Employers' Liab.
-
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.
737 So. 2d 31
La. 1999
Roberts, 634 So.2d at 344 ; Atchison v. May, 201 La.
-
Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems
716 So. 2d 58
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
in support of this contention.
- Lachney v. Johnson & Johnson 689 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America 683 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
Harmon v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
654 So. 2d 815
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1021(10)(D), we note the intent and purpose of the Worker’s as follows: “The principle underlying the Worker’s Compensation Act is a compromise in which the employer surrenders the immunity against liability which he would otherwise enjoy in all cases in which he was without fault, and, in return, the employee loses his right to full damages for his injury and accept
- Guillory v. Interstate Gas Station 653 So. 2d 1152 La. 1995
-
Jeffery v. Thibaut Oil Co.
652 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1993) [$10,000 for mental anguish for damage to hair at beauty salon]; [accidentone year of PTSD$7,177].
-
Billiot v. BP Oil Co.
645 So. 2d 604
La. 1994
143, 168-70 (discussing "quid pro quo" of workers' compensation scheme); see also Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co., 590 F.2d 655 , 658-59 (6th Cir.1979); Roberts, 634 So.2d at 343-44 (La.1994) (citing 13 Malone & Johnson, La.Civil Law Treatise, Workers' Compensation Law and Practice § 32 (1980)); Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of N.O., (La.
- Jeansonne v. Wick Pub. Co. 646 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Billiot v. BP Oil Co. 617 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co. 617 So. 2d 477 La. 1993