DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO, 611 So. 2d 1383.

139 citing documents.

  • Schindler v. ORLEANS REGIONAL SEC. 862 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
  • Morris v. Westside Transit Line 841 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    of New Orleans, Castaneda v. Louisiana Ins.
  • King's Joint Venture v. Marino 827 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Campo v. Correa 828 So. 2d 502 La. 2002
  • Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that prescription was interrupted with regard to an injured employee's claims against a third party tortfeasor when the employee filed a timely suit seeking worker's compensation benefits from his employer.
  • Gatlin v. Cox Communications, Inc. 818 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Of New Orleans, the court held that “a suit timely filed against the employer for workers’ compensation interrupted prescription as to the subsequent claim against the third-party tort-feasor for damages.” In Bradley v. Mike Rougee Corporation, 95-967 (La.App.
  • Phillips v. Francis 817 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Kratzer v. PPM Contractors, Inc. 803 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    of New Orleans, Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 99-0571, p. 6 (La.
  • Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 778 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Lucero v. Burney Gear Co. 764 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    [,CARAWAY, J. In this case, the alleged tortfeasor/de-fendant challenges the continued applica *182 tion of the holding in Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
  • Migliori v. Willows Apartments 765 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    wherein the Supreme Court concluded that prescription was interrupted with regard to an injured employee’s claims against a third-party tortfeasor when the employee filed a timely suit seeking workers’ compensation benefits from his employer.
  • Gray v. Mounir 746 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    In Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that prescription is interrupted with regard to an injured employee's claims against a third-party tortfeasor who was solidarily liable when the employee filed a timely suit seeking workers' compensation benefits from his employer.
  • Cornay v. FMC Corp. 735 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    of New Orleans, Taussig v. Leithead, 96-960 (La.App.
  • Layman v. City of New Orleans 753 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • Ballam v. Seibels Bruce Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    See Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Lewing v. Sabine Parish Police Jury, 95-630 (La.
  • Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc. 712 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Anderson does support Pear's contention, but it is an old case that fails to provide a rationale for reaching such a result, and, more significantly, (La.
  • Gibson v. Roberts 701 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Tureaud v. Acadiana Nursing Home 696 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Gulf States Land & Dev., Inc. v. OUACHITA NAT. BANK 705 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
  • Molony v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 683 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    In support of its argument, for the proposition that it and the plaintiff's workers compensation carrier are solidarily liable.
  • Wilson v. City of Shreveport 682 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , , the court, citing Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, held that a suit timely filed in district court against a third-party tortfeasor interrupted prescription against an employer for worker's compensation benefits.
  • Gary v. Camden Fire Ins. Co. 676 So. 2d 553 La. 1996
    of New Orleans, where this court held that an employer and third-party tortfeasor are solidary obligors and that a timely filed lawsuit against an employer for workers' compensation benefits interrupts prescription with regard to subsequent claims against a third-party tortfeasor.
  • Bradley v. Mike Rougee Corp. 676 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    of New Orleans, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "a suit timely filed against the employer for worker's compensation interrupted prescription as to the subsequent claim against the third party tort-feasor for damages."
  • James v. Formosa Plastics Corp. of La. 672 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    of N.O., Narcise v. Illinois Central Gulf R.R.
  • Morgan v. Bates 671 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    We further held that prescription is also interrupted as to third-party tortfeasors, who under Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, are solidarity hable with the employer.
  • Rizer v. American Sur. & Fid. Ins. Co. 669 So. 2d 387 La. 1996
  • Gary v. Camden Fire Ins. Co. 665 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    of N.O., we concluded that Gary's employer and the third-party tortfeasor defendants in this case were solidarily liable, and that the interruption of prescription against the employer preserved all rights assertable by Gary against the third-party tortfeasors.
  • Lewing v. Sabine Parish Police Jury 664 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Chevalier v. Bossier 663 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    23:1209; citing Hoefly v. Government Employees’ Insurance Company
  • Jones v. Department of Transportation & Development 659 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
  • Cantrelle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See |3also Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
  • Vedros v. Public Grain Elevator of N.O., Inc. 654 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Billiot v. BP Oil Co. 645 So. 2d 604 La. 1994
    43, 168-70 (discussing "quid pro quo" of workers' compensation scheme); see also Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co., 590 F.2d 655 , 658-59 (6th Cir.1979); Roberts, 634 So.2d at 343-44 (La.1994) (citing 13 Malone & Johnson, La.Civil Law Treatise, Workers' Compensation Law and Practice § 32 (1980)); Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of N.O., (La.
  • Nordgren v. Trojan Contractors, Inc. 648 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    In support of their position, plaintiffs cite the cases of Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, for the proposition that a timely filed worker’s compensation claim interrupts prescription against tortfeasors who are lia *981 ble with the employer jointly, severally and insólido.
  • Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Hosp. 634 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
  • Brown v. Drillers, Inc. 630 So. 2d 741 La. 1994
  • Miller v. One Shell Square 619 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Furthermore, it would appear that the application of Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, to the facts of this case would also suggest that the application for supervisory writs be denied.
  • Francis v. American Well Serv. & Drilling, Inc. 617 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    is the most recent recognition of the principle that an obligation may be in solido even though the obligations of the obligors arise from separate acts or by different reasons.