Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 619 So. 2d 57.

26 citing documents.

Todd Crochet v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This court noted that the supreme court’s decision in Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 92-1784 (La.1993), set forth the requirement that an employer prove “that the employee was receiving disability benefits rather than normal retirement benefits and then by proving the proportion of funds contributed by the employer to those contributed by the employee.” City of Natchitoches, 657 So.2d at 323.
Robby Sandifer v. Calcasieu Parish Public Works La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The Parish cites Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 92-1784 (La.1993), rehearing denied, 6/22/93, (La.1993), asserting that the extent to which the employer must track its funds to obtain a credit is contrary to the wording of the statute and contrary to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s interpretation of the law.
Todd Crochet v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The employer satisfies that burden by showing that the employee is receiving disability benefits and then proving the proportion of its contribution to those the employee contributed, and the proportion need not be proven “with mathematical precision.”
Crochet v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 217 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
The employer satisfies that burden by showing that the employee is receiving disability benefits and then proving the proportion of its contribution to those the employee contributed, and the proportion need not be proven “with mathematical *468 precision.”
Louisiana Office of Risk Management v. Richard 125 So. 3d 398 La. 2013
Jones v. General Motors Co., 03-1766, p. 12 (La.4/30/04)
Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 970 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
23:1225(C)(1)(c) when the firefighter was eligible for tenure-based retirement benefits under the same plan that provided disability benefits); (La.
Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 902 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
23:1225(C)(1)(c) when the firefighter was eligible for tenure-based retirement benefits under the same plan that provided disability benefits); (La.
Jones v. General Motors Corp. 871 So. 2d 1109 La. 2004
Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 871 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The Taylor court stated as follows: The early cases discussing offset, Matthews v. City of Alexandria, [ ] actually involved a different statute, R.S.
Lawrence Hagler Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The Taylor court stated as follows: The early cases discussing offset, Matthews v. City of Alexandria, [ (La.
Feild v. General Motors Corp. 828 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel 817 So. 2d 1 La. 2002
23:1225(C)(1)(c) when the firefighter was eligible for tenure-based retirement benefits under the same plan that provided disability benefits)
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Belt 815 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Pace v. City of New Orleans, 99-1661 (La.App.
Pace v. City of New Orleans 761 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Rapp v. City of New Orleans 750 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Taylor v. Columbian Chemicals 744 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
In support she cites Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 92-1784 (La.5/24/93), , Gentile v. Baton Rouge General Med.
LeBlanc v. Lake Charles Dodge, Inc. 725 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, ( see e.g. City of Natchitoches v. Williams, 94-1411 (La.App.
Duckworth-Woods Tire Service v. Lettellier 720 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See, Palisi v. City of New Orleans Fire Dept., 95-1455 (La.App.
Palisi v. City of New Orleans Fire Dept. 690 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Willis v. Gray Sales & Service, Inc. 689 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Similarly, only discusses the 1989 amendment.
Rochon v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 673 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp. 660 So. 2d 841 La. 1995
City of Natchitoches v. Williams 657 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Herty v. City of New Orleans 654 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
[5] the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "LSA-R.S.
Dupre v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Fire Department 648 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Walker v. Parish of Jefferson 631 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
referred to in the submitted briefs as Matthews II, the Supreme Court said this in footnote 7 at page 60: “This section was amended by Act 454 of 1989, effective January 1, 1990, to substitute the word “or” for the word “and” before subsection (d).