Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sassone v. Elder, 626 So. 2d 345.
-
Holt v. Phipps
733 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)
- Leger v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 732 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Melder v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 731 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
-
Donaldson v. United Community Ins. Co.
741 So. 2d 676
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)
-
Fitzgerald v. Tucker
715 So. 2d 1281
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 559 cmt.
- Davis v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 709 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Harkins v. Gauthe
707 So. 2d 1308
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Industrial Sand and Abrasives, -54 (La.1983) (collecting cases); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
- Martello v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Trentecosta v. Beck
703 So. 2d 552
La. 1997
(citing W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 111 (5th ed.1984)).
- Moore v. Cabaniss 699 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Bell v. Rogers 698 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 693 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage
690 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
56(c) stating: In the federal system, when the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof at trial, there is no genuine issue of material fact if the nonmoving party cannot come forward at the summary judgment stage with evidence of such sufficient quantity and quality for a reasonable juror to find the party can
- Hayes v. Autin 685 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Kosmitis v. Bailey 685 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
Lawson v. Straus
684 So. 2d 959
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Eg., Koenig v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
- Zellinger v. Amalgamated Clothing 683 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Christian v. Fontenot 672 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Duplessis v. Warren Petroleum, Inc. 672 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-
Thomas v. Busby
670 So. 2d 603
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The defendants, assert that even assuming that Busby used the words that Thomas claims he used, those words set forth nondefamatory "facts" on which the opinion was based and are therefore not defamatory.
-
JW Rombach, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson
670 So. 2d 1305
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Industrial Sand and Abrasives, -54 (La.1983) (collecting cases); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
- Joyner v. Wear 665 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club
663 So. 2d 379
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Industrial Sand and Abrasives, -54 (La.1983) (collecting cases); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
- Guillory v. State Farm Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Davis v. Borskey 660 So. 2d 17 La. 1995
-
Landry v. Roberson Advertising Service, Inc.
660 So. 2d 194
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
This elevated standard of review of a motion for summary judgment in a (1993): [I]n order to survive a motion for summary judgment, a defamation plaintiff must produce evidence of sufficient quality and quantity to demonstrate that he likely will be able to meet his burden of proof at trial.
- Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 661 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Hebert v. Louisiana Ass'n of Rehabilitation Professionals 683 So. 2d 216 La. 1995
-
Black v. Gorman-Rupp
655 So. 2d 717
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(citations deleted) (La.
- Hebert v. Louisiana Ass'n of Rehabilitation Professionals, Inc. 653 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- DeStevens v. Harsco Corp. 652 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Moore v. Esponge 651 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Tarpley v. Colfax Chronicle 650 So. 2d 738 La. 1995
- Romero v. Thomson Newspapers 648 So. 2d 866 La. 1995
-
Tarpley v. Colfax Chronicle
649 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
“Because of media defendant’s having to go to a full trial in multitudes of nonmeritorious defamation claims would certainly 16stifle the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press, the rule in other summary judgment cases favoring trial on the merits is simply not applicable in defamation eases,” and “...
- Bell v. Roddy 646 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Evans v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co.
643 So. 2d 389
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Industrial Sand and Abrasives, -54 (La.1983) (collecting cases); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
- Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
- Davis v. Borskey 643 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Gray v. FeBornstein 642 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Williams v. Trapolin Law Firm 641 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.
639 So. 2d 730
La. 1994
Industrial Sand and Abrasives, -54 (La.1983) (collecting cases); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
-
Navis v. Times-Picayune Publishing Corp.
631 So. 2d 1338
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
The standard for review of a motion for summary judgment in a (1993): [1]n order to survive a motion for summary .