Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Myles v. Turner, 612 So. 2d 32.

22 citing documents.

Michael Munn v. Paul Gagnon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
for the proposition that delays for appeal begin to run from receipt of notice rather than the mailing of the notice.
Charlie Caldwell Jr., Shreveport City Marshal and the Shreveport City Marshal's Office v. the City of Shreveport La. 2023
Joseph J. Bazile, Jr. and Barbara B. Mire Versus Charles E. Zetzmann and Anne Zetzmann La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Donald R. Modicue v. Prince Of Peace Auto Sale, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Gerald J. Calogero v. USA Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
art. 50021 within which to appeal a city court judgment, does not commence to run until “receipt of notice of judgment rather than upon the mere mailing of said notice.” (La.
Morice v. Alan Yedor Roofing & Construction 216 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
Fletcher v. Southern Insurance Agency 204 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ranson v. Cooper 228 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Keesler Federal Credit Union v. Rivero, 2014-0095 (La.App.
Alexander v. Maki 183 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
Kessler Federal Credit Union v. Rivero 153 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
George L. Bruce v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
art. 5002 commences to run upon receipt of notice of judgment rather than upon the mere mailing of said notice.”
Hacienda Construction, Inc. v. Newman 44 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Erazo v. Morton 33 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
|B(“we hold that the 10-day appeal delay provided for in La.Code Civ.Proc.
Bethea v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 22 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Myles v. Turner our Louisiana Supreme Court held that “the ten-day appeal delay provided for in La.
Bayou Concession Scrap, Inc. v. Rose Towing, Inc. 996 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
TRANSCHANT v. State 978 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
11/21/07), , is valid law, then one can reasonably conclude that the result we reach herein is also a reasonable conclusion.
ARGENCE LLC v. Box Opportunities, Inc. 980 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
First National Bank of Commerce v. Boydell 857 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Southern Inspec. and Test. v. Skyline Steel 848 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
the Supreme Court noted that the wording of art. 4907(B) stood in stark contrast to the wording in art. 5002 regarding the commencement of the delays.
Smith v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 626 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Stevenson v. State Farm 624 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Adkins 621 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Supreme Court held that the LSA-C.C.P.