DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development, 615 So. 2d 305.

18 citing documents.

  • Dyke v. Time Warner Cable 961 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Olivier v. After Crash, Inc. 954 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Peter Olivier v. After Crash, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Lazaro v. New Orleans Brass 933 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    See Duncan v. State, DOTD, Davillier v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, 97-2848 (La.
  • Distinguished Plumb v. City of New Orleans 854 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Hotard v. Buezo 853 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    and Dev., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “although a case may be remanded for introduction of additional evidence, this power must be exercised sparingly, limited to cases wherein the evidence was unobtainable with due diligence for the first trial and the record reflects that the new evidence is likely
  • Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP. 843 So. 2d 1066 La. 2003
    See, e.g., Duncan v. State, DOTD, Breuhl v. Hercules Concrete Plumbing, Inc., 94-2311, p. 11 (La.App.
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Fitch 836 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Atwood v. Ewing Timber, Inc. 836 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Duncan v. State, DOTD, Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline, 95-721 (La.App.
  • Campbell v. Melton 817 So. 2d 69 La. 2002
    and Develop., 92-2174 (La.2/2293), ; Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 255 La.
  • Wyble v. TUNICA BILOXI GAMING ECONOMIC DEV. 776 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    This has been fully discussed by the Supreme Court in Duncan v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development
  • Mason v. C C C Express, Inc. 754 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Duncan v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline, 95-721 (La.App.
  • Davillier v. TMSEL 718 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    23:1333; Duncan v. State, DOTD, Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline, 95-721 (La.App.
  • Jenson v. First Guar. Bank 699 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Duncan v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
  • White v. Dental Arts, Inc. 685 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    and Development, sets forth the criteria that must be satisfied for an employee to invoke La.R.S.
  • Singletary v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 681 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The hearing officer’s reasoning is consistent with Duncan v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court referred to the claimant’s recovery as being limited by the “maximum recovery period,” implying the statute under which the claimant was receiving benefits.
  • Briscoe v. Jerry's Furniture Mart, Inc. 676 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    & Dev., Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline, 95-721 (La.App.
  • Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline 670 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996