Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perkins v. McDow, 615 So. 2d 312.

28 citing documents.

Constance S. Williams and Abram Zenon v. Nasser Abousamak La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Distinguished Pray v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 210 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Coleman v. United Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 181 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Chisley v. Coleman 972 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Jones v. Foster, 41,619 (La.App.2d Cir.12/13/06), ; Wade v. Autoland Inc., 32,903 (La.App.2d Cir.5/26/00), , writ denied, 2000-2180 (La.10/13/00), .
Barton v. U.S. Agencies Casualty Insurance Co. 948 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Hartzo v. AMERICAN NAT. PROP. AND CAS. INS. 951 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
After extensive review of the jurisprudence, that "these cases serve to point out the mischief caused by the permissive user provisions of automobile liability policies."
Hartzo v. American National Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 951 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Jones v. Foster 945 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Perkins v. McDow, 92-2192 (La.2/22/93), ; Wade v. Autoland Inc., 32,903 (La.App.
Barbara Miguez v. Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
It is worth noting that, the supreme court explained that: This court has never extended coverage to a second permittee when the named insured has expressly prohibited the first permittee from allowing anyone else to drive the vehicle, even though t
Miguez v. Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. 926 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Miller v. Tassin 905 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether or not “[ ...
Campbell v. Verrett 829 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Valdetero v. Commercial Union Insurance 782 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Wade v. Autoland, Inc. 767 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Tross v. Windsor Ins. Co. 726 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 707 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Here, had McBride’s own automobile been involved, there is no question that coverage would have existed
Dixon v. Tillman 694 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Johnson v. White 693 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Turner v. Alexander 690 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Simms v. Butler 685 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Blackman v. Eggerton 684 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Langston v. Shirley 682 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Mahaffey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
American Home Assurance Company v. Czarniecki, 255 La.
Manzella v. Doe 664 So. 2d 398 La. 1996
Panzico v. Price 658 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Ranger Ins. Co. v. Mancuso 652 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
In support of their position, (La.App.
Panzico v. Price 647 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
provided the controlling jurisprudence regarding second permittees.
Norton v. Lewis 623 So. 2d 874 La. 1993
32:891 et seq.; Waits v. Indemnity Ins.