Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roger v. Dufrene, 613 So. 2d 947.

54 citing documents.

Barbara K. Ballanco v. Nella A. Morvant La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
“[A]n action on a contract is governed by the ten year prescriptive period for personal actions.” (La.
Mark Wightman, Doctor Of Dental Surgery; Courtney Wightman, Doctor Of Dental Surgery; Wightman La. 2022
Anthony Misita d/b/a Daydreamer Stables and Glenn and Ellen Torres v. John Maumoulides, Lakelots, Inc., Intrepid, Inc., One … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Maxine Thomas v. Housing Louisiana Now, L.L.C., Tracy F. Robinson, Master Builders & Contractors, L.L.C., Richard J. Mithun, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Roger v. Dufrene, explained that “[a]n action in tort is governed by the prescriptive period of one year while an action on a contract is governed by the ten year prescriptive period for personal actions.”
Matthew A. Dephillips, Individually, And On Behalf Of La. 2020
3d 1122, 1128.3 The court explained that the proper prescriptive period to be applied in any action depends on the nature of the cause of action, citing Roger v. Dufrene , (La.
Beverly Smith v. Citadel Insurance Company as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and Goauto Insurance Company La. 2019
Matthew A. Dephillips, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Hospital Service District No. 1 … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Upscale Fashions, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London 254 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Roger v. Dufrene , , 949 (La.
Fils v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. 263 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Marlon Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department 228 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Caballero v. Keystone Customs, L.L.C. 188 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2 Cir 8/23/95); , writ denied, 95-2347 (La.12/8/95), ().
Norwood v. Mobley Valve Services, Inc. 144 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Mandina, Inc. v. O'Brien 156 So. 3d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Claborne v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 116 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Kay Barnett, Et Ux. v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Barnett v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Co. 157 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. J. Everett Eaves, Inc., 09-2161, p. 7 (La.7/6/10), ().
Paul Le, Indiv. and D/B/A Bonsai Sushi Downtown Lafayette, LLC v. the Bradford Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Le v. Bradford Group, LLC 105 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Ames v. Ohle 97 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
applied the distinction between nonfeasance and misfeasance to determine whether an action sounds in tort or contract for the purposes of prescription.
JSB Interests, LLC v. Hanover Insurance Co. 62 So. 3d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dahan Novelties & Co. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Isidore Newman School v. J. Everett Eaves, Inc. 42 So. 3d 352 La. 2010
Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc. 13 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Horton, 33,157 (La.App.
Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
SOUTHERN CHIROPRACTIC AND SPORTS REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. v. Coleman 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Inez R. Strahan v. Sabine Retirement & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Strahan v. SABINE RETIREMENT & REHAB. CENT. 981 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Johnson v. UNOPENED SUCCESSION 969 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Thomas v. STATE EMPLOYEES GROUP BENEFITS 934 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
M & L Industries, LLC v. Derek Hailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
M & L INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Hailey 923 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Imperial Chemicals Ltd. v. Pkb Scania (Usa) 929 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Allen J. Roche v. Jefferson Davis Electric Cooperative, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“It is the nature of the duty breached that should determine whether the action is in tort or in contract.”
Roche v. Jefferson Davis Electric Cooperative, Inc. 922 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
“It is the nature of the duty breached that should determine whether the action is in tort or in contract.”
Chandler v. Kenyan 862 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Raymond v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 856 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
American Zurich Ins. Co. v. Johnson 850 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 1992), rev'd on other grounds, (La.App.
Eastern Capital Holdings, Ltd. v. Marsh & McLennan of Louisiana, Inc. 814 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-50 (La.1993), the Supreme Court likened the duty imposed upon an insurance agent to that of an attorney or physician.
Prince v. K-Mart Corp. 815 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See: King v. Phelps, Dunbar, L.L.P., 98-1805 (La.6/4/99), ; , 951 at N. 2 (La.
Krolick v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Krolick v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HRS 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Serv. 759 So. 2d 45 La. 2000
Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Horton 756 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Schoen v. Walling 728 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Sadler v. Midboe 723 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
K & M ENTERPRISES v. Richland Equipment Co. 700 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997