Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Simeon v. Doe, 618 So. 2d 848.

43 citing documents.

Frank Scurlock v. Kurt Heitmeier, Robert Heitmeier and Eustis Insurance, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
April Markiewicz, wife of/and Mark Markiewicz v. Sun Construction, LLC, Penn Mill Lakes, LLC, and Cooper Engineering, Inc, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
McGillion v. Englade 274 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
William Johnson v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Nancy Cormier v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Carolyn Louviere v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Earl v. Gusman 228 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mercer v. Lowe 217 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Anderson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 153 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Murphy Cormier Contractor, Inc. v. State of La., Dept. of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-53 (La.1993): (on rehearing), we set out a two step inquiry, derived from Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 108 S.Ct.
Murphy Cormier General Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals 114 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-53 (La.1993): (on rehearing), we set out a two step inquiry, derived from Berkovitz v. *600 United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct.
Banks v. Parish of Jefferson 108 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Brent J. Menard v. Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-53 (La.1993), as follows: (on rehearing), we set out a two step inquiry, derived from Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 108 S.Ct.
Menard v. Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals 94 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-53 (La.1993), as follows: (on rehearing), we set out a two step inquiry, derived from Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct.
Marino v. Parish of St. Charles 27 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 1992), writ denied, ).
Fossier v. Jefferson Parish 985 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
City of Hammond v. Parish of Tangipahoa 985 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-53 (La.1993); Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856 (La.App.
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Ann Welch v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See, e.g., Simeon v. John Doe, d/b/a The Sweet Pepper Grill
Brown v. ANA Ins. Group 965 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Fowler, 556 So.2d at 15-16 ; -53 (La.1993); Thornhill v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 95-1946, 1947, 1948, 1949 & 1950, p. 14 (La.App.
Law v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 909 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See, e.g., Simeon v. John Doe, d/b/a The Sweet Pepper Grill
Grayson v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 837 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 817 So. 2d 1107 La. 2002
See, e.g., Simeon v. John Doe, d/b/a The Sweet Pepper Grill
Smith v. Roussel 809 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
"The duty to warn applies to `any danger inherent in the normal use of the product which is not within the knowledge of an ordinary user.'"
INVESTMENT MGMT. SVCS., INC. v. Village of Folsom 808 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-853 (La.1993); Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, pp. 8-9 *607 (La.App.
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
See Simeon v. John Doe, d/b/a The Sweet Pepper Grill, (La.
Hickman v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Co., Inc. 768 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Irion v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 760 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 747 So. 2d 489 La. 1999
See, e.g., Simeon v. John Doe, d/b/a The Sweet Pepper Grill
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Dufour v. EZ SERVE CONVENIENCE STORES 731 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Hardy v. Bowie 719 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Lambert v. RIVERBOAT GAMING ENFORC. DIV. 706 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training 687 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-53 (La.1993); (on rehearing); Christian v. Fontenot, 672 So.2d at 444 .
Melady v. Wendy's of New Orleans, Inc. 673 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Miller v. STATE, DOTD 679 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 5/31/95), , writ denied, 95-1669 (La.10/6/95)
Moncla v. Albertson's Inc. 670 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
`Unreasonably dangerous' has been defined as meaning `the article which injured the plaintiff was dangerous to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by an ordinary consumer.'"
Brown v. Chabanais 663 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
the Supreme Court applied a different theory of recovery and accordingly remanded the case for the taking of further evidence consistent with its views.
Ortego v. Jefferson Davis Parish School Bd. 657 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Amato v. Office of Com'r of Securities 644 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
*419 The dissent attempts to distinguish Moresi as a federal civil rights action and asserts that the proper test for a qualified immunity is set forth in Rick v. State, Department of Transportation & Development, on rehearing.
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 636 So. 2d 211 La. 1994
[1] I now agree with Justice Blanche's dissent in DeBattista , noting that my own reasons for dissent in that case improperly focused in part on La.Civ.Code art. 2317 as to the strict liability of a seller of contaminated products.
Rick v. STATE, DOTD 630 So. 2d 1271 La. 1994