Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of LLZ v. MYS, 620 So. 2d 1309.
-
State ex rel. E.N.
774 So. 2d 194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
v. M.Y.S., citing, State in the Interest of JML, (La.App.
- State ex rel. B.J. 767 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
State ex rel. C.P., K.P.P. & K.M.P.
768 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of D.T.
-
State ex rel. A.N.B.
750 So. 2d 413
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of D.T.
- State ex rel. Stewart v. Stewart 723 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- State, in Interest of Sm 719 So. 2d 445 La. 1998
- State, in Interest of Sm 709 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State, in Interest of Bkf 704 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
State, in Interest of Jm
702 So. 2d 45
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of S.C.
-
State in Interest of DT v. KT
697 So. 2d 665
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of S.C.
-
State ex rel. D.T. v. K.T.
697 So. 2d 665
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of S.C.
- State in Interest of KNF 677 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
State in Interest of Ardoin
667 So. 2d 1144
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
v. M.Y.S., stated "before parental rights can be terminated, the State must prove, by no less than clear and convincing evidence, that all the elements of at least one subsection of R.S.
- State in Interest of DMH v. DMH 661 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State, in Interest of Ga 664 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
In Interest of Jln
658 So. 2d 272
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
v. M.Y.S., State in Interest of C.V.
-
State ex rel. D.D.
650 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
v. M.Y.S., citing State in Interest of JML, (La.App.
- In Interest of L. v. As 649 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
-
State in Interest of SC v. DNC
639 So. 2d 426
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
v. M.Y.S., State in the Interest of V.T., supra .