DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

  • Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 632 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Guilfore v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 631 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Turning to the majority's section entitled "De Novo Review", I : The discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great", and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Patin v. Duplessis Pontiac-Buick-GMC 632 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    The supreme court, recently restated our standard of review where an excessive damage award is an issue: The initial inquiry is whether the award for the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the "much discretion" of the trier of fac
  • Sinor v. National Cas. Co. 633 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the court stated that: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily nonspecific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to what articulation suffices to justify modification of a generous o
  • Smith v. Jack Dyer & Associates, Inc. 633 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Boudreaux v. Colonial Lloyd's Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Foret v. Terrebonne Towing Co., Inc. 632 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Pino v. Gauthier 633 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Quirk v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. ST. UNIV. 629 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • Lauriano v. Schwegmann Giant Super Market 629 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Quirk v. Board of Supervisors 629 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Futrell v. Scott Truck and Tractor Co. 629 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Raney v. Walter O. Moss Regional Hosp. 629 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Recently, in Hae Woo Youn v. Marine Overseas Corp., et al, (1993), the supreme court emphasized that the discretion accorded to a trier of fact in an award of general damages is "great" and even vast.
  • Doe v. McNulty 630 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Most recently, the Supreme Court established the standards for appellate review of general damage awards as follows: The discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate *828 court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Underwood v. Dunbar 628 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • Brinson v. Morgan City Housing Authority 629 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    reiterated the rule of law recognizing the “vast” discretion afforded the factfinder, and the absolute necessity to find an abuse of this discretion before an appellate court may alter a general damage award.
  • Daigle v. Johnson 633 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    92-C-3017; American Motorist Insurance Company v. American Rent-All, Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Dodson v. Community Blood Center 633 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    (92-C-3017), at page 1261 of the opinion, the supreme court prescribed the standard for appellate review of general damage awards: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing suc
  • Morgan v. Belanger 633 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    If the injury sustained was clearly proved, it would be a simple matter to apply the doctrine of Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., (92 C 3017, 1993).
  • Ly v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections 633 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    2324.1; Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp, et al, 92-C-3017
  • Hill v. Sampson 628 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    the court stated: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily nonspecific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to what articulation suffices to justify modification of a generous or stingy a
  • Sandidge v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 626 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al.
  • Henderson v. Domingue 626 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Theriot v. Allstate Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1337 La. 1993
    the majority opinion contains the following commentary of the interpretation and application of the controlling legal precepts: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing
  • Grubbs v. Gulf Intern. Marine, Inc. 625 So. 2d 495 La. 1993
    2342 , 124 L.Ed.2d 252 (1993), writ granted, (1992), vacated in part on other grounds, (1993), and Treadway v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, No. 92-C-1500 (La.App.
  • Kimble v. Reason 626 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that: [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Feigler v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 626 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.
  • Alaywan v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    the discretion vested in the trier of fact in setting general damages is "great, and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."