Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richoux v. Tulane Medical Center, 617 So. 2d 13.

33 citing documents.

Charles R. Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Alfred Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. 74 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Barbara Deville v. Albert Craig Pearce, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
DeVILLE v. Pearce 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Kenyetta M. Brooks v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Brooks v. Christus Health Southwestern La. 954 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Ray Marie Douet v. Azalea Villa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Douet v. Azalea Villa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Freddie Mae Young v. Harry J. Mobley, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Young v. Mobley 923 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wanda Faye Butler v. Miguel A. Depuy, Jr., M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 10/14/98), ( (La.App.
Butler v. DePuy 876 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 10/14/98), ( (La.App.
Williams v. Memorial Medical Center 870 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Florane v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital 822 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Williams v. Metro Home Health Care Agency, Inc. 817 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Johnson v. STATE/UNIVERSITY HOSP. 807 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Parker v. Harper 803 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Hinson v. Glen Oak Retirement Home 774 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. 755 So. 2d 226 La. 2000
4 Cir.1993) (allowing expert's affidavit because it "includes facts derived from his own personal observation and inspection of plaintiffs' property as well as his opinion as a professional engineer of the cause of the damage"); (La.App.
Simmons v. Berry 748 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 8/28/96) , ; (La.App.
Lee v. Wall 726 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
3d Cir.04/03/96), ; (La.
Pugh v. Beach 722 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
3rd Cir. 8/28/96), ; (La.App.
Perricone v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 721 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Robertson v. Northshore Regional Medical Center 723 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
4th Cir.10/1/97), -63 ; (La.App.
Morris v. Ghoniem 703 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
deciding whether a reasonable patient in Mr. Morris’ position would have consented to this procedure, despite a material risk of infection, is the medical review panel’s written reasons for their decision: “This panel finds that the procedure performed is one that the typical patient would agree to undergo in spite of the potential risk of infection.” (La.App.
Miceli v. Armstrong World Industries 691 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Alex v. Dr. X 692 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
RELEVANT CASE LAW REGARDING THE GRANTING OF A DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A (La.App.
Powers v. Tucker 690 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Dr. X 679 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Venable v. Dr. X 671 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
We find this case strikingly similar to the case relied upon by appellee, -17 (La.App.
Stevens v. Bernard 670 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Miramon v. Woods 639 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by