Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ellefson v. Ellefson, 616 So. 2d 221.

13 citing documents.

Hon. John W. Greene (Ret.), as Undertutor of and on Behalf of the Minor Child, Haley Jones Versus … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Simms Hardin Co. v. 3901 Ridgelake Drive, L.L.C. 119 So. 3d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/01) , , writ denied, 01-1926 (La.10/12/01), ; (La.App.
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 90 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/21/93) , , writ denied, 93-1011 (La.5/21/93), and reconsideration denied, 93-1011 (La.6/25/93), ; Megison v. Megison, 94-0152 (La.App.
Gebhard v. Gebhard 60 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 9/14/94), ; (La.App.
Robertson v. Robertson 37 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Our jurisprudence also supports that “agreements meeting the requirements of conventional obligations and which are not adverse to the purpose and intent of child support have been held enforceable.” (La.App.
Lauve v. Lauve 6 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ray v. Ray 960 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 3/17/93), , writ denied, the child support provision provided, "[T]his contractual amount of child support is not subject to increase or decrease for any reason whatsoever."
Spiers v. Roye 927 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Stout v. Stout 719 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 9/14/94); , writ denied, 94-2823 (La.1/13/95); (where the parties identified death, remarriage, and open concubinage as "the only termination or modification events") (La.
Sunalma Financial Enterprises, S.A. v. Zervoudis 684 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Ellefson v. Ellefson 666 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The trial court then granted the exception as to the alimony but denied that aspect regarding child support, (LaApp.
Territo v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 662 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Megison v. Megison 642 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994