Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chambers v. LeBlanc, 598 So. 2d 337.

43 citing documents.

David Powell, On Behalf Of Himself And All Others Similarly Situated v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. 2025
P. art. 74 .1 See Chambers v. LeBlanc , (La.
Eric Aguiluz, Christian Aguiluz-Ramos and Neyda Aguiluz, Individually and Surviving Spouse of Decedent, Williams Jose Aguiluz, and on … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Ethan A. Miller v. Kevin B. Dice La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Rose Gant v. CNA Insurance Company, Philip A. Spence, LLC, and Phillip A. Spence La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Lisa Jarreau v. Thomas E. Gibbs d/b/a The Law Office of Thomas Gibbs and Robert T. Talley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
First NBC Bank v. Broussard 131 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Chumley v. White 80 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
and following Frisard v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
Mary Louise Seely Jenkins v. Johnnie Mae Cooper Seely La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
art. 74, -38 (La.1992), stated: When damage is caused to the plaintiff in the parish where the wrongful conduct occurred, then that parish is the parish of proper venue under [La.Code Civ.P.
MB INDUSTRIES, LLC v. CNA Ins. Co. 960 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(per curiam) mandates that a legal malpractice suit be filed where the wrongful conduct occurred.
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
See, (review of a lower court judgment overruling exception of venue); (La.App.
Colvin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND 947 So. 2d 15 La. 2007
M & L Industries, LLC v. Derek Hailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and Herlitz Construction Co. Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., note 1 (La.1981).
M & L INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Hailey 923 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and Herlitz Construction Co. Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., note 1 (La.1981).
Wharton v. Ridgell 922 So. 2d 461 La. 2006
Belwise Aquaculture Systems, Inc. v. Paul A. Lemke, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered the issue of venue in a wherein the legal malpractice action was brought in the plaintiffs’ domicile, Livingston Parish.
Belwise Aquaculture Systems, Inc. v. Lemke 904 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered the issue of venue in a wherein the legal malpractice action was brought in the plain *942 tiffs’ domicile, Livingston Parish.
Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. v. Carter 902 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
the supreme court examined venue in the context of a legal malpractice action.
Patterson v. Alexander & Hamilton, Inc. 844 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Thomas v. Mobil Oil Corp. 843 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
App. 1st Cir.1987), J & L Industries v. Rives, 31,742, (La.App.
Frisard v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 837 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
BAMBURG STEEL BLDS., INC. v. Lawrence Gen. Corp. 817 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Danny Weaver Logging, Inc. v. Norwel Equipment Company, 33,793 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/00), ; (La.App.
Yarnell v. Crews 803 So. 2d 979 La. 2001
Yarnell v. Crews 803 So. 2d 979 La. 2001
Crawford v. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF LA. 814 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
and Herlitz Construction Co. Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., note 1 (La.1981).
Albarado v. Union Pacific RR Co. 787 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Simmons v. Templeton, 684 So.2d at 537
Danny Weaver Logging Inc. v. Norwel Equip. Co. 766 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Strahan v. Maytag Corp. 760 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Small v. Frieberg 734 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Williams v. Ochsner Clinic, 97-2275 (La.App.
RICHMOND EX REL. RICHMOND v. Dow 712 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Distinguishing the cases cited by the defendants, she asserts that the Article 74 jurisprudence concerning "where the wrongful conduct occurred," Johnson v. Tschirn, 94-0085 (La.
Charles v. First Financial Insurance 709 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Instead, to wit: When damage is caused to the plaintiff in the parish where the wrongful conduct occurred, then that parish is the parish of proper venue under article 74, even if the plaintiff is in the parish of his domicile at the time of wrongful conduct or if damage progresses in the parish of plaintiffs domici
Boullion v. PPG Industries, Inc. 704 So. 2d 1179 La. 1997
Williams v. Ochsner Clinic 701 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Simmons v. Templeton 684 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The above rule was adopted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in a
Hebert v. MID SOUTH CONTROLS AND SERV. 688 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
G.C. & K.B. Investment, Inc. v. Otillio 672 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Stovall v. Carimi 667 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-38 (La.1992), plaintiff brought a legal malpractice action in his domicile, Livingston Parish, against an attorney domiciled in Iberville Parish practicing law in Ascension Parish, arising out of a failure to timely file a lawsuit in East Baton Rouge Parish.
Jordan v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co., Inc. 656 So. 2d 988 La. 1995
Johnson v. Tschirn 635 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Blitch Architects, Inc. v. Avenue Partnership 626 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Rodrigue v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 615 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Crowley Concrete Professionals v. Rivertown Properties, Inc. 609 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Daniels v. Rachal 610 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
addressed a similar factual situation.
Maxwell v. Wampler 604 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by