Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moreno, 619 So. 2d 62.

67 citing documents.

State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Although the purpose of the stop is limited and the duration is brief, an investigatory stop constitutes a ‘seizure.’ ” (citing Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Ulmer 116 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 56 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
State v. Patterson 38 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hunter 949 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Kelly 946 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
level of suspicion for an investigatory stop need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (in making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person *225 stopped of criminal activity); (an investigative stop must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person to be stopped is or is about to be engaged in c
State v. Joseph 901 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
State v. Temple 854 So. 2d 856 La. 2003
State v. Triche 848 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); (1993).
State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Quest, 00-205 (La.App.
State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (La.
State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Dupleche 823 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Hughes 821 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (La.
State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Goins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 800 So. 2d 783 La. 2001
(citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Allen 792 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Givens 785 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Burke 782 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Sylvester 781 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Green, 97-702 (La.App.
State v. Phillips 774 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
(emphasis in original); see also, -65 (La.1993); Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, -1093 (La.
State v. Russell 764 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Flagg 760 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009 (La.App.
State v. Joseph 759 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
State v. Rodriguez 761 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Young 751 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (La.
State v. Pennison 763 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Landry 742 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Davis, 98-365 (La.App.
State v. Gentras 733 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (La.
State v. Mitchell 731 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009, p. 8 (La.
State v. Ingram 726 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (La.
State v. Washington 725 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Washington 725 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
art. 215.1, "although the purpose of the stop is limited and the duration is brief, an investigatory stop constitutes a `seizure.'" ( Terry v. Ohio, supra ; United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. London 720 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009 (La.App.
State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Green 706 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); State v. Lassere, 95-1009, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 701 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997