Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knight, 611 So. 2d 1381.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    11/2/01), (substitute counsel was filling in for assigned counsel on the day of trial); (La.
  • State v. Expose 141 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The defendant’s (1993), to support his argument is misplaced.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    6/23/95), 3 In Knight, the attorney handling the matter was on vacation, and the trial court refused to grant a continuance even though the attorney filling in knew nothing about the case.
  • State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In support of his position, the defendant cites Laugand, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    the defendant had been represented by the attorney from the indigent defender's office who handled most of the cases for that particular section of criminal court.
  • State v. Hamilton 834 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    where the trial court denied a request for a continuance by a substitute public defender handling the regular public defender’s docket for the day the defendant’s trial happened to be scheduled.
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Commodore 774 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Laugand 759 So. 2d 34 La. 2000
  • State v. Holmes 701 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Const. art. I, § 13 (1974)
  • State v. Mitchell 680 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    (Lemmon, J., concurring).
  • State v. Cannon 658 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Sheppard 646 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Addison 644 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    While it is unclear from the supreme court's opinion whether the public defender specifically stated in his motion for continuance that he was unprepared for trial, can also be distinguished.
  • Vincent v. Tusch 618 So. 2d 385 La. 1993
    See Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, and cases cited therein.