Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Meyers, 620 So. 2d 1160.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keith Joseph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
In support of her argument
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Emile Richard -Aka- Emile Joseph Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
the Supreme Court reinstated a conviction for first degree robbery when the defendant took money from an unmanned cash register then used intimidation to escape after the store clerk arrived.
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“ ‘The purpose of the force or intimidation element of robbery is to distinguish, by imposition of a more severe penalty, those takings which pose a greater risk to the victim.’ ” Id., 01-0007, p. 9, 820 So.2d at 484
State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Also, we note the supreme court has stated: (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Also, we note the supreme court has stated: this Court distinguished the crimes of theft and robbery.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JENNIFER RENEE ROBERSON A/K/A JENNIFER ROBERTSON A/K/A JENNIFER THOMAS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In support of her argument
State v. Roberson 956 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In support of her argument
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JENNIFER RENEE ROBERSON A/K/A JENNIFER ROBERTSON A/K/A JENNIFER THOMAS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
7/1/93), the use of force to retain a stolen item supports a conviction for first degree robbery.
State v. Roberson 924 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Further, she acknowledges that under State v. Myers, 92-3263 (La.7/1/93), , the use of force to retain a stolen item supports a conviction for first degree robbery.
State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. McDonald 838 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Goodley 820 So. 2d 478 La. 2002
this Court distinguished the crimes of theft and robbery.
State v. Jordan 728 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Harris 708 So. 2d 387 La. 1998
State v. Willis 706 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Brown 694 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
It makes no difference, force or intimidation may be applied at any time in the course of the crime.
State v. Warren 712 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Distinguished State v. Hamilton 646 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Ford 643 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court held that the defendant's act of holding up what the victim reasonably believed was a gun constituted intimidation committed during a theft and supported a finding of guilty of first degree robbery.
State v. Cutwright 626 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993