Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knighten, 609 So. 2d 950.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David E. Bender 152 So. 3d 126 La. 2014
    KNOLL, J. | iThis case requires us to determine whether the District Court’s failure to observe the strictures of a (La.App.
  • State v. Bender 120 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/15/94) , -76 ; (La.App.
  • State v. Givens 888 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Harris 820 So. 2d 471 La. 2002
    See, (rejecting explanations when prosecution failed to exclude other prospective jurors, "who were not of a racial group, who shared the same characteristic as that claimed as the reason for the challenge."); (La.App.
  • State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
  • State v. Jones 729 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Banks, 694 So.2d at 408 ; (La.App.
  • Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments 694 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    3rd Cir.1992)); Mamon , 26,337 at p. 19; 648 So.2d at 1359 ; Johnson, 621 So.2d at 1171 ; (La.
  • State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. McClain 685 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Montgomery v. Debartolo 661 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    In the context of peremptory challenges, (La.App.
  • State v. Payne 657 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Dabney 633 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    5 ; State v. Knighten, *1375 (La.App.
  • Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 622 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993