Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knighten, 609 So. 2d 950.
-
State of Louisiana v. David E. Bender
152 So. 3d 126
La. 2014
KNOLL, J. | iThis case requires us to determine whether the District Court’s failure to observe the strictures of a (La.App.
-
State v. Bender
120 So. 3d 867
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/15/94) , -76 ; (La.App.
- State v. Givens 888 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
-
State v. Harris
820 So. 2d 471
La. 2002
See, (rejecting explanations when prosecution failed to exclude other prospective jurors, "who were not of a racial group, who shared the same characteristic as that claimed as the reason for the challenge."); (La.App.
- State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
-
State v. Jones
729 So. 2d 57
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Banks, 694 So.2d at 408 ; (La.App.
-
Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments
694 So. 2d 1142
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3rd Cir.1992)); Mamon , 26,337 at p. 19; 648 So.2d at 1359 ; Johnson, 621 So.2d at 1171 ; (La.
- State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
- State v. McClain 685 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Montgomery v. Debartolo
661 So. 2d 158
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
In the context of peremptory challenges, (La.App.
- State v. Payne 657 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Dabney
633 So. 2d 1369
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
5 ; State v. Knighten, *1375 (La.App.
- Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 622 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993