DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Peart, 621 So. 2d 780.

126 citing documents.

  • State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Ste. Marie 723 So. 2d 407 La. 1998
    art. 930.8(C) by advising the defendant at sentencing of the three-year time limit on applications for post-conviction relief after the finality of his conviction does not exempt the defendant from the time limit); (directive in La.
  • State v. Alexander 720 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Campbell, supra .
  • State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Bowers 712 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Tran 709 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. McIntyre 708 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Rose 708 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State ex rel. Glover v. State 704 So. 2d 242 La. 1997
    5th Cir. 3/29/94), , and because an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is in most cases better raised in an application for post-conviction relief than on direct review, see, and because this is relator’s first application for post-conviction relief, La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Campbell 703 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lassere 683 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189 La. 1995
  • State v. Hughes 653 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    provides him with a rebuttable presumption that all indigent defendants in Section "G" were receiving ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel's caseload and lack of resources.
  • State v. Franklin 648 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
    However, this Court may deny defendant the benefit of retroactive application of new rules of criminal procedure it creates, in cases, like Jackson, where the rules arguably have a state constitutional basis, see, (presumption of ineffectiveness of counsel "to apply prospectively only"), because this Court is not bound to adopt the Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis when deciding the applicability of a State rule.
  • State v. Franco 646 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Touchet 642 So. 2d 1213 La. 1994
    854 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975)
  • State v. Jones 639 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
  • State v. Green 631 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Pettibone 626 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    OPINION Effective Assistance of Counsel A defendant’s constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel, and the examination of claims of ineffectiveness
  • State v. Scire 625 So. 2d 156 La. 1993
  • Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
    See, e.g., Polk, et al. v. Edwards, et al., 1993 WL 364714 (La.1993); Cajun Elec.
  • State v. Wigley 624 So. 2d 425 La. 1993
    "[i]f legislative action is not forthcoming and indigent defense reform does not take place, this Court, in the exercise of its constitutional and inherent power and supervisory jurisdiction, may find it necessary to employ the more intrusive and specific measures it has thus far avoided....
  • State v. Clark 624 So. 2d 422 La. 1993