Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hamilton, 681 So. 2d 1217.

26 citing documents.

State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 33-34 (La.4/11/00), ; 34 State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, pp. 14-15 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 33-34 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, pp. 14-15 (La.9/5/96), ; -11 (La.1988), cert.
State v. Thomas 962 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Jackson, supra ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
1997); (rev'd); State v. John Brooks, 92-3331 (La.1/17/95), (rev'd); State v. Marcus Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), (aff'd); State v. Derek Landry, 97-0499 (La.6/29/99), (rev'd); State v. Rogers LaCaze, 99-0584 (La.1/25/02), (aff'd); State v. Shareef Cousin, 96-2973 (La.4/14/98), (rev'd); State v. Juan Smith, 98-1417 (La.6/29/01), (aff'd); State v. Phillip Anthony, 98-0406
State v. Kennedy 957 So. 2d 757 La. 2007
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), -28 ; State ex rel.
State v. King 951 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
345 , 148 L.Ed.2d 277 (2000); State v. Hamilton , 92-1919 p. 14-15 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 574 ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.09/05/96), ; State v. Jackson, 29,470 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/97), .
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 574; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 15 (La.9/5/96), ; cert.
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919,(La.9/5/96), ("The issue is not close.
State v. Irish 807 So. 2d 208 La. 2002
State v. Deal, 00-0434 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 13 (La.9/5/96), (question posed by prosecution at capital sentencing proceeding to state witness, a pathologist, as to whether murder victim's death was heinous, atrocious, and cruel, and witness's affirmative answer were both improper; doctor's response was not a medical opinion but a legal conclusion that was solely within th
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
1982)); see also State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 13 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 574 ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 15 (La.9/5/96), ; cert.
State v. Pendelton 783 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, pp. 17-18 (La.9/5/96), -28 ; -57 (La.
State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
art. 770(3); State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), ; cert.
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
Though the court was "reluctant to admit [the confession] since it was not a conviction," it felt constrained by this Court's ruling in State v. Marcus Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 12 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
For example, this Court recently opined: While, ideally, the jury should be instructed on the proper narrow construction of this aggravating circumstance, Brogdon, 457 So.2d at 630 , this Court has held in State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, pp. 15-16 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
While, ideally, the jury should be instructed on the proper narrow construction of this aggravating circumstance, Brogdon, 457 So.2d at 630 , this court has held in State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 15-16 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.09/05/96), .
State v. Comeaux 699 So. 2d 16 La. 1997
See State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96); .
State v. Bourque 699 So. 2d 1 La. 1997
State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 p. 17-18 (La.9/5/96), -1228 .
State v. Hebert 697 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 12 (La.9/5/96), .