Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Garner, 621 So. 2d 1203.
-
State Ex Rel. Tc
60 So. 3d 1260
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 6/15/94) , ; (La.App.
-
State ex rel. T.C.
60 So. 3d 1260
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 6/15/94) , ; (La.App.
-
State v. Barthelemy
32 So. 3d 999
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4th Cir. 1994), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Moss
17 So. 3d 441
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4th Cir. 1994), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Tillman
7 So. 3d 65
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4th Cir.1994), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Burnes
997 So. 2d 906
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4th Cir.1994), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Robinson
996 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4th Cir. 1994), ; (La.App.
- State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Jones 832 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Woods 828 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
-
State v. Vigne
798 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
“The court’s decision was based on its belief that it is unfair to penalize the government through application of the exclusionary rule where the police would have obtained the evidence even if no misconduct occurred.” (La.App.
- State v. Everett 770 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Tassin 758 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Matthews
679 So. 2d 977
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Rule 2-12.4, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal; (La.App.
- State v. Melbert 649 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994