Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Abadie, 612 So. 2d 1.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Rudy Emanuel Melerine La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State v. Aguliar-Benitez 260 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Whatever the ambiguities of our earlier cases on this point, we now hold that when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present, whether or not the accused has consulted with his attorney."); State v. Abadie , , 4 (La.
State v. Jefferson 261 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1880, 1885 , 68 L.Ed.2d 878 (1981); State v. Hohn, 95-2612, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Wesley 77 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
under the totality of the circumstances, including the necessary fact that the accused, not the police, reopened the dialogue with the ^authorities.” cert.
State v. Welch 59 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980)
State v. Reynolds 55 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
570 , 139 L.Ed.2d 410 (1997); cert.
State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Williams 965 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Robertson 927 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Shank 924 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
where the court found the defendant had unequivocally invoked his right to counsel by twice asking to speak to an attorney and attempting unsuccessfully to contact one.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Payne 833 So. 2d 927 La. 2002
State v. Hutchinson 819 So. 2d 324 La. 2002
1880, 1885 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), -5 (La.1993), require suppression of relator’s statement, and the lower courts erred in finding otherwise.
State v. Loyd 810 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1602, 1612 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); cert.
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
1602, 1612 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); -5 (La.1993), cert.
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
State v. Gilliam 748 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Coston 720 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Reeves 714 So. 2d 696 La. 1998
570 , 139 L.Ed.2d 410 (1997); cert.
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Ceasar 700 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
1602, 1612 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); cert.
State v. Reeves 696 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Nixon 687 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 672 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Miranda v. Arizona, supra, also provides that when a suspect indicates “in any manner and at any stage of the process that he wishes to consult with an attorney before speaking there can be no questioning.”
State v. Hohn 668 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
applies directly to defendant's claim.
State v. Corley 633 So. 2d 151 La. 1994
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
486, 491 , 112 L.Ed.2d 489 (1990); -5 (La.1993), petition for cert.
State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993