Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wigley, 624 So. 2d 425.

25 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
As for defense counsel, in State v Wigley , (La.
State v. Singleton 216 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
6 Appointed attorneys are entitled to be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses and overhead costs, but need not receive a fee for their services, as long as the services do not reach “unreasonable levels.”
State v. High 184 So. 3d 7 La. 2015
State v. Citizen, 04-1841 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Craig, 93-2515 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
for the proposition that because Mr. Malveau was unemployed and did not have the resources to be self-employed, the court’s reappointment of him to the case was unreasonable, oppressive, and in violation of counsel’s due process rights.
State v. Kyle 117 So. 3d 498 La. 2013
State v. Citizen, 04-1841 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Craig, 93-2515 (La.5/23/94)
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Citizen, 04-1841 (La.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Citizen, 04-1841 (La.4/1/05), ; and State v. Reeves, 06-2419 (La.5/5/09), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Further, were not followed.
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Further, were not followed.
State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
[11] that "any assignment of counsel to defend an indigent defendant must provide for reimbursement to the assigned attorney of properly incurred and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and overhead costs."
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
So there was a huge contribution made by the private bar in this case to see that this case was done appropriately, which Calcasieu Parish, the 14th JDC is not going to ever have to be–have to pay for.” the supreme court held “To require that attorneys represent indigents with no recompense while bearing the expenses of the representation, when the attorneys must maintain their own practices and continue to meet their other professional and financial obligations in today’s changed legal marketpl
State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the supreme court held "To require that attorneys represent indigents with no recompense while bearing the expenses of the representation, when the attorneys must maintain their own practices and continue to meet their other professional and financial obligations in today's changed legal marketplace, `is so
State v. Brown 907 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
this Court held that "any assignment of counsel [from the private] bar to defend an indigent defendant must provide for reimbursement to the assigned attorney of properly incurred and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and overhead costs".
State v. Citizen 898 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
Also in 1993, wherein we held that uncompensated representation of indigents, when reasonably imposed, is a professional obligation burdening the privilege of practicing law in this state and does not violate the constitutional rights of attorneys.
State v. Wammack 877 So. 2d 989 La. 2004
The trial court is instructed to conduct a
State v. Lee 879 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State Ex Rel. Ap 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State ex rel. A.P. 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Matthews 756 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
defendant claims a stay is the only proper remedy.
State v. Jeff 761 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 642 So. 2d 180 La. 1994
State v. Green 631 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The district attorney also cited a conflict because of the reliance by that office on the criminal court fund, noting that the fund is a potential source of funds for an accused’s
State v. Scire 625 So. 2d 156 La. 1993
State v. Clark 624 So. 2d 422 La. 1993