DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McHugh, 630 So. 2d 1259.

22 citing documents.

  • The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of the State of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    The legislature shall enact laws to implement this policy.” 4 (La.
  • Jason Hayes, Et Al. v. University Health Shreveport, Llc D/b/a Ochsner Lsu Health Shreveport And Ochsner Lsu Health … La. 2022
    1983) (recognizing the “right to be free from government interference”); (La.
  • State v. McMillan 30 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Davy C. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94)
  • State v. Harris 21 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. Knowles 917 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    The state, on the other hand, argues that Agent Clinton had the regulatory authority to make an "investigatory stop" to determine if the occupants of the vehicle had obtained a "check-in" permit required by WMA regulations, noting that this authority was recognized in State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. Benoit 817 So. 2d 11 La. 2002
    In State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), , a wildlife enforcement officer "inspected" the contents of an ice chest by opening the chest and subjecting its contents to close scrutiny.
  • State v. Weaver 805 So. 2d 166 La. 2002
    Const. art. IX, § 1; see State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94); -1265 .
  • State v. Jackson 764 So. 2d 64 La. 2000
    The court of appeal acknowledged that this court has distinguished insurance checkpoints from DWI checkpoints, citing to State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), , and Fields v. State, 98-0611 (La.7/8/98), .
  • State v. Bullock 766 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Rather, the stops are more similar to the limited stop allowed in State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. Dereyna 750 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. McHugh, 92-1852, pp. 4, 5 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. James 740 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. McHugh, 92-1852, pp. 4-5 (La.1/6/94), .
  • State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    P. art. 703 D; State v. McHugh, 92-1852, pp. 4-5 (La.1/6/94), .
  • La Seafood Management v. La Wildlife 719 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Const. Art. IX, § 1; see State v. McHugh, 92-1852, p.9 (La.1/6/94); -65 .
  • State v. Downing 710 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1/6/94), , 1263: A law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense and may demand of him his name, address, and an explanation of his actions.
  • State v. Colarte 688 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94); .
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    See also State v. McHugh, 92-1852 (La.1/6/94); (State's interests in safeguarding wildlife and fisheries for benefit of the people was compelling interest which supported conclusion that statutory scheme authorizing suspicionless stops of hunters did not violate right to privacy; State Constitution, property laws, and regulatory statutes all recognized paramount i
  • State v. Wingate 668 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
  • State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
    State v. Perry, supra; Hondroulis v. Schuhmacher, supra.
  • State v. Stowe 635 So. 2d 168 La. 1994