DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tucker, 626 So. 2d 720.

70 citing documents.

  • State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) opinion reinstated on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Benjamin 703 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    opinion reinstated on rehearing by (La.
  • State v. Stan 703 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Basile 700 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Clausen 697 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 696 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Short 694 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 694 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Curtis 681 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    2 Cir. 1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Ellington 680 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Fleming 676 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); rehearing granted and opinion reinstated on rehearing
  • State v. Nixon 672 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, adopted the definition of an “actual stop” of a citizen as defined in Hodari D. However, recognizing that Article 1, Section 5, of the Louisiana Constitution provides greater protections than those provided by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Louisiana Supreme Court went beyond Hodari D.
  • State v. Birtha 669 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, adopted the definition of an “actual stop” of a citizen as defined in Ho-dari D. However, recognizing that Article 1, Section 5, of the Louisiana Constitution provides greater protections than those provided by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Louisiana Supreme Court went beyond Hodari D.
  • State v. Wilson 657 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Matthews 654 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    1993), opinion adhered to on rehearing, (1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D. definition of "actual stop," holding that an actual stop of a person occurs only when he submits to a show of police authority or is physically contacted by the police.
  • State v. Byes 648 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    At the time Byes abandoned the cocaine and pipe he had neither been actually seized nor was a on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Collins 637 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, recently adopted the definition of an "actual stop" of a citizen as defined in Hodari D. However, recognizing that Article 1, Section 5, of the Louisiana Constitution provides greater protections *744 than those provided by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Louisiana Supreme Court went beyo
  • State v. Stowe 635 So. 2d 168 La. 1994
  • State v. Daniels 631 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    4th Cir.1993), original opinion withdrawn from publication, rehearing granted, reinstated and reaffirmed on rehearing when he noticed the police, Daniels did not run.
  • State v. Hamilton 630 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    2158 , 80 L.Ed.2d 543 (1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court found that an individual is “seized” -within the meaning of that provision when the individual is either “actually stopped” or when an “actual stop” of the individual is “imminent.” on rehearing, (opinion reinstated), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted Hodari D., insofar as it defines when an “actual stop” of a citizen has occurred and held “that an individual has not been ‘actually stopped’ unless he submits to a police show of authorit