Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cavazos, 610 So. 2d 127.

42 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keith Joseph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
–29 (La.1992), the supreme court explained that “a prosecutor’s misstatements of the law during voir dire examination, or in his opening and closing remarks, do not require reversal of a defendant’s conviction if the court properly charges the jury at the close of the case.” Like Cavazos
State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tyrek Randall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Pittman 267 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Cavazos , , 128 (La.
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cavazos , , 128 (La.
State v. Raine 238 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cavazos , , 128-29 (La.
State v. Jones 178 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
As reasoned in State v. Cavazos, 93-1371, p. 1 (La.12/10/92), , “a substantial | ^probability that jurors may have convicted [Mr. Wallace] under an incorrect definition of the crime justifies setting aside a conviction on due process grounds even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection.” We do note that the Louisiana Supreme Court has cautioned courts in its applicati
State v. Cortez 122 So. 3d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
wherein the supreme court held a post-verdict attack on the sufficiency of an indictment does not provide grounds for setting aside a conviction unless the indictment failed to give fair notice of the offense charged or failed to set forth any identifiable offense.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Marshall, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court considered a case in which the bill of information for attempted second degree murder included the phrase “or inflict great bodily harm .
State v. Marshall 157 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court considered a case in which the bill of information for attempted second degree murder included the phrase “or inflict great bodily harm....” However, and although the bill of information was read to the jury, the opening statements by |sthe State and the defense counsel refe
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(per curiam); State v. Cedrington, 98-253, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(per curiam); State v. Cedrington, 98-253, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Phillips 61 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Morrison 55 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(per curiam); State v. Cedrington, 98-253 (La.App.
State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the supreme court stated the following: In outline, the bill tracked the short form provided by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Hill 930 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Nevertheless, in State v. Cavazos, supra, [ ] the Supreme Court cited Williamson for the proposition that: A substantial probability that jurors may have convicted the defendant under an incorrect definition of the crime justifies setting aside a conviction on due process grounds even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
("prosecutor's misstatements of law during ...
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
State v. Sullivan 729 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. LeBlanc 719 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Chisolm, 95-2028, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
State v. Holmes 701 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Chisolm 691 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
(per curiam) ( State v. Shilow, 252 La.
State v. Page 680 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Allen 664 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-129 (La.1992); (La.App.
State v. Jynes 652 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Harris 643 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Johnson 637 So. 2d 1033 La. 1994
State v. Porter 626 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Monroe 626 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993