Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cox Cable v. City of New Orleans, 624 So. 2d 890.

36 citing documents.

Calcasieu Parish School Board Sales & Use Department, Et Al. v. Nelson Industrial Steam Company La. 2021
2d 215 (finding reclassification of certain income as “allocable,” which was only sometimes taxed, to “apportionable,” which was always taxed at an apportioned rate, was either a new tax or increase in tax); Cox Cable New Orleans, (La.
Vincent Fertitta v. Regions Bank La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
See Cox Cable New Orleans, (La.
Beer Industry League of Louisiana and Wine and Spirits Foundation of Louisiana, Inc. v. the City of New … 251 So. 3d 380 La. 2018
Cox Cable New Orleans, Inc. v. City of New Orleans , , 894 n. 5 (La.
Normand v. Cox Communications Louisiana, LLC 167 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
J-W Power Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue & Taxation 59 So. 3d 1234 La. 2011
See Cox Cable New Orleans, (wherein the cable company, without purporting to be the agent of its customers, sought to recover sales tax monies paid by its customers.
J-W Power Co. v. State Ex Rel. Secretary of the Department of Revenue & Taxation 40 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1 Cir. 6/29/92), (wherein the claimant paid the taxes without protest and later attempted to sue for refund); Cox Cable New Orleans, (wherein the cable company, without purporting to be the agent of its consumers, sought to recover tax monies paid by its customers); United Artist Theater Circuit, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 95-17 (U.S.Dist.Ct., E.D.La.2/5/96), 1996 WL 46709 , (wherein the operators of movie theatres sought to recover
Fransen v. City of New Orleans 988 So. 2d 225 La. 2008
Cox Cable New Orleans, , 894 n. 5 (La.1993).
Washington Mutual Bank v. Henry Charles Monticello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Washington Mut. Bank v. Monticello 976 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Fransen v. City of New Orleans 970 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
In Re Melancon 935 So. 2d 661 La. 2006
Cox Cable New Orleans, -896 (La.1993) (In some circumstances in a declaratory judgment action, an exception of no right of action is appropriate to assert lack of standing.).
Estate of Nicks v. PAT. COM. FUND OVER. BD. 939 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Slaughter 917 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
See Cox Cable New Orleans, citing Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, ("[T]he meaning of words or phrases may be ascertained by the words or phrases with which they are associated.
Rapides Parish Communications District v. Centurytel, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Rapides Parish Communications District v. Century Cellunet of North Louisiana Cellular Ltd. Partnership 903 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Further, the meaning of a word in a statute must be determined within the context of the whole statute: Cox Cable New Orleans
Ciliberti v. Mistretta 879 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Dilosa 848 So. 2d 546 La. 2003
See, e.g., Cox Cable New Orleans
Lasyone v. Phares 818 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cleco Evangeline v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 813 So. 2d 351 La. 2002
CLECO EVANGELINE, INC. v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 808 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Afscme, Council 17 v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospital 789 So. 2d 1263 La. 2001
Police Assn. of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, 94-1078, p. 19 (La.1/17/95), ; Cox Cable New Orleans, Radiofone
State v. Brazley 773 So. 2d 718 La. 2000
Police Assn. of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, 94-1078, p. 19 (La.1/17/95), ; Cox Cable New Orleans, Radiofone
Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance 720 So. 2d 1186 La. 1998
rt of their arguments, the City cites this Court's opinions in City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), (holding that every Home Rule Charter in existence before the adoption of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 is limited only to the extent that the home rule is inconsistent with the 1974 Constitution); Cox Cable New Orleans, (holding that the City of New Orleans' tax on cable subscribers was not a "natural extension of the taxable amusements for which state law auth
Palmer v. LOUISIANA FORESTRY COM'N 701 So. 2d 1300 La. 1997
In Cox Cable New Orleans, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 92-2311 (La.9/3/93), .
Dow Hydrocarbons & Resources v. Kennedy 694 So. 2d 215 La. 1997
Sharkey's Reef, Ltd. v. Polit 688 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. 686 So. 2d 823 La. 1997
Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 93-1005 (La.3/24/94), ; see also LA.
Guidry v. Dufrene 687 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Meredith v. Ieyoub 672 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
art. 681; Cox Cable New Orleans, Byrd v. International Paper Company, 594 So.2d at 962.
FGB Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Riedlinger 671 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The standard for such an exception was set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Cox Cable New Orleans, -896 (La.1993): An action can be brought only by a person having a real and actual interest which he asserts.
Mouton v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 657 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 681; Cox Cable New Orleans, Byrd v. International Paper Company, 594 So.2d at 962 .
Sattar v. Royal Sonesta, Inc. 654 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Cox Cable New Orleans, -96 (La.1993).
Police Ass'n of New Orleans v. New Orleans 649 So. 2d 951 La. 1995
Cox Cable New Orleans, Radiofone
Gallaspy v. Washington Parish Police Jury 645 So. 2d 1139 La. 1994
Boudreaux v. Entrekin 643 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
With regard to the exception before us, : An action can be brought only by a person having a real and actual interest which he asserts.