Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Taylor v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co., 630 So. 2d 237.

24 citing documents.

Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. and Exco USA Asset, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Daniel Hyatt v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hyatt v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. 149 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Dalton D. Broussard, Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
The plaintiffs suggest that Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., is persuasive with regard to the “hired” auto issue.
Broussard v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 94 So. 3d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The plaintiffs suggest that Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., is persuasive with regard to the “hired” auto issue.
Scarbrough v. OK Guard Dogs 879 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court observed: Although Articles 1803 and 1804 were enacted in 1985 ..., Louisiana courts have long recognized that when a plaintiff settles with and releases one of several joint tortfeasors, he thereby deprives the remaining obligors of the right to contribution against the rel
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 878 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., where the Louisiana Supreme Court observed: Although Articles 1803 and 1804 were enacted in 1985 ..., Louisiana courts have long recognized that when a plaintiff settles with and releases one of several joint tortfeasors, he thereby deprives the remaining obligors of the right to contribution against th
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Antonini 862 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Batson v. SOUTH LOUISIANA MEDICAL CTR. 778 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
art. 1803; Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Systems Contractors Corporation v. Williams Architects 769 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 765 So. 2d 994 La. 2000
Barnes v. Reed 743 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Bridges v. State 738 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Griggs v. Riverland Medical Center 722 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Soileau v. Ardoin 707 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Oxley v. Sabine River Authority 663 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
National Tea Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co. 663 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Co., , 239 n. 9 (La.1993): [U]nder the Louisiana statute the plaintiff who settles shrewdly for a large sum with a defendant ultimately found to bear a small percentage of fault reaps the benefit of his negotiations.
Futch v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Co., we are again required to measure CU’s rights not against the general law of this state as codified in Civil Code articles 1803 and 1804, but against the specific law governing UM insurers.
Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. 652 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Faulkner v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 645 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Adkins v. Burris Mill & Feed, Inc. 644 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Hosp. 634 So. 2d 331 La. 1994