Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lasha v. Olin Corp., 625 So. 2d 1002.

335 citing documents.

David L. Bienemann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bienemann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 3 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Johnson v. E.I. Dupont Denemours & Co. 7 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Milazzo v. Olsten Home Health Care, Inc., 97-30, p. 8 (La.App.
Brown v. Trask 998 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. American Rent-All, Inc.
Troy Davis v. Willis Provost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Davis v. Provost 980 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In the Interest of Hardy Ray Krantz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In the Interest of H.R.K. 980 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Schindler v. Harrah's Las Vegas, Inc. 976 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/2/95) , , writ denied, 95-2820 (La.2/2/96), ); see also
Theodore Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Ourso 964 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814, p. 9 (La.12/12/03)
Hosli v. Rent-A-Center, Inc. 957 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Robinson v. Flowers 949 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
pp. 2d Cir.7/9/03), , writ denied, 03-2608 (La.1/9/04), , Judge Caraway recognized the deference entitled to the trier of fact under Clement , but stated, "Nevertheless, when a fact finder incorrectly finds no fault on one party and conducts no analysis under Watson , such legal error skews the process altogether, requiring de novo review," (for the proposition that incorrectly finding one party without fault is legal error).
Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins 946 So. 2d 133 La. 2006
this Court held that a legal error occurs when a trial court applies incorrect principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.
International Paper Company v. Sheriff William Earl Hilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
International Paper Co. v. Hilton 950 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Overton v. Shell Oil Co. 937 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
citing Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Southern Treats v. Titan Properties, LLC 927 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Galen-Med, Inc. v. Porter 928 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 4/11/01), , 967: Requiring that plaintiffs prove their injuries to a "reasonable medical certainty" holds plaintiffs to an artificially high standard
Harris v. Hakim 924 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Brenda Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 923 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Lewis v. Smith 920 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Hamilton v. Wild 917 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Maynor v. Vosburg, 25,922 (La.App.2d Cir.11/28/94) , writ denied, 95-0409 (La.4/28/95) American Motorist Ins.
ST. ANDREWS PLACE v. City of Shreveport 914 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Leonard v. Favaloro 916 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Tucker v. Sullivan 913 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Glass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 907 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Chavers v. Travis 902 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Aguilar v. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SE LA. 900 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Lasha v. Olin Corp. Dufrene v. Imperial Fire and Cas.
Soares v. Tidewater, Inc. 895 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Lottie L. Gentry Dodson v. K-Mart Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Dodson v. K-Mart Corp. 891 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Oliveaux v. St. Francis Medical Center 889 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
This is a summary of the general burden of proof expressed in Lasha v. Olin Corp., 93-0044 (La.10/18/93), , 25 A.L.R.
Michael R. Fontenot v. Kipp L. Duplechine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Fontenot v. Duplechine 891 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Fred Lee Perkins v. Wurster Oil Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Debra Parish Philmon v. Jake C. Philmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Philmon v. Philmon 886 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Perkins v. Wurster Oil Corp. 886 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lasha v. Olin Corp., 93-0044 (La.10/18/93), .
Himel v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 887 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Himel v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 887 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Edwin J. Dupuis v. Picard Steel Erectors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
“When such a prejudicial error of law skews the trial court’s finding of a material issue of fact and causes it to pretermit other issues, the appellate court is required, if it can, to render judgment on the record by applying the correct law and determining the essential facts de novo.” (La.
Dupuis v. Picard Steel Erectors, Inc. 883 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-“When such a prejudicial error of law skews the trial court’s finding of a material issue of fact and causes it to pretermit other issues, the appellate court is required, if it can, to render judgment on the record by applying the correct law and determining the essential facts de novo.” , (La.1993) Therefore, we must decide whether Mr. Dupuis did in fact, suffer a work-related accident and injury.
Finnie v. LeBlanc 875 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Donald E. O'brien v. Dr. Akbar Rizvi La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
O'BRIEN v. Rizvi 877 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Thibodeaux v. STONEBRIDGE, LLC 873 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004