Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lasha v. Olin Corp., 625 So. 2d 1002.

335 citing documents.

Pettifield v. Venture, Inc. 770 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lombas v. Southern Foods, Inc. 760 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Orgeron v. Prescott, 636 So.2d at 1040
Griffith v. Cathey 762 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Barriere Construction Co., Inc. v. Systems Contractors Corporation 764 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 762 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Dean 767 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Ledet v. Burger King/Sydran 763 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Skipper v. Berry 762 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
With regard to a pre-existing condition, the supreme court, -06 (La.1993) (citations omitted), stated: The defendant’s liability for damages is not mitigated by the fact that the plaintiffs pre-existing physical infirmity *61 was responsible in part for the consequences of the plaintiffs injury by the defendant.
Stuart v. New City Diner 758 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Knepper v. Robin 745 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Clifton v. Coleman 748 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
We Sell Used Cars, Inc. v. United Nat'l Ins.
Parker v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 763 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
We Sell Used Cars, Inc. v. United Nat’l Ins.
Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc. 754 So. 2d 209 La. 1999
Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Banks v. New York Life Ins. Co. 737 So. 2d 1275 La. 1999
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Jessen 732 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Lazard v. Crescent Livery Ass'n 727 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Conedera v. Musgrove 736 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
As the trial court noted in his reasons for judgment, “damages are not mitigated by the fact that the plaintiff suffered from some pre-existing illness which may have aggravated the injuries resulting from the accident.”
Carter v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp. 717 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Ludwig v. Jefferson Performing Arts Society 714 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 713 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
With regard to a pre-existing condition, the supreme court, -6 (La.1993) (citations omitted), stated: The defendant's liability for damages is not mitigated by the fact that the plaintiff's pre-existing physical infirmity was responsible in part of the consequences of the plaintiff's injury by the defendant.
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries 714 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURER 710 So. 2d 1077 La. 1998
White v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 713 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Evans v. Lungrin 708 So. 2d 731 La. 1998
Sanders v. International Indem. Co. 708 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 4/9/97) , ; -1006 (La.1993).
Milazzo v. Olsten Home Health Care, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Boudoin v. Crawford and Marshall, Ltd. 709 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Cooper v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., 96-924 (La.
Wartelle v. Women's and Children's Hosp., Inc. 704 So. 2d 778 La. 1997
Lasha v. Olin Corp., 93-0044 (La.10/18/93), .
Miramon v. Bradley 701 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Centanni v. Spizer 699 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Cooper v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 692 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
It further correctly points out that when a judgment is based in part on prejudicial errors of law, the reviewing court must conduct a de novo review of the evidence without reference to the manifest error rule
Whitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 690 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Farrell v. Gulf Insurance Co. 690 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Todd v. State 685 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Trahan v. McManus 689 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
The Louisiana Supreme Court, stated: In Louisiana tort cases and other ordinary civil actions, the plaintiff, in general, has the burden of proving every essential element of his case, including the cause-in-fact of damage, by a preponderance of the evidence, not by some artificially created greater standard.
Roig v. Travelers Ins. Co. 694 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Orgeron v. Prescott, 636 So.2d at 1040
Torres v. Doe 688 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Prestenback v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 688 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
American Motorist Insurance Company v. American Rent-All, Inc., (La.App.
Devlin v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. 686 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Orgeron v. Prescott, 636 So.2d at 1040
Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 683 So. 2d 689 La. 1996
Id.; (where the lower court incorrectly held the plaintiff to the standard of proving his case by a "reasonable degree of medical certainty").
Greening v. Bell 681 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Maynor v. Vosburg, 25,922 (La.App.2d Cir. 11/28/94), , writ denied 95-0409 (La.
Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev. 680 So. 2d 1154 La. 1996
See, , 844 n. 2 (La.1989); Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins.
Hickman v. Exide, Inc. 679 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
and citations therein; American Motorist Ins.
Spangler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 673 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
for the proposition that a tortfeasor is liable not only for the injuries which he causes directly to *680 the tort victim, but also for additional suffering caused by inappropriate medical treatment.
Succession of Jurisich 694 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Chatelain v. Circle K Corp., 94-0227 (La.App.
Gaines v. DAIICHI CHUO SHIPPING, INC. 673 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996