Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Ventre, 613 So. 2d 992.

16 citing documents.

  • Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    App. 3 Cir. 1992), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Davis 786 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir.1991), writ denied, State v. Kendrick, 96-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Howard 786 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir.1991), writ denied, State v. Kendrick, 96-1636 (La.App.
  • Bellard v. Castille 759 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied
  • Steed v. ST. PAUL'S UNITED METH. CHURCH 728 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.1992), writ denied (1993); Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.
  • Martin v. Martin 716 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3rd Cir.1992), writ denied
  • Valure v. Valure 696 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    3rd Cir.1992), writ denied
  • State v. Finley 664 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    5 Cir.1992), writ denied
  • State v. Webster 664 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    5th Cir.1992), writ denied, defendant argues that the state cannot `piggyback' felony convictions in order to avoid the five-year cleansing period.
  • Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Group, Inc., (3 Cir.1992), writ denied and writ denied Veillon v. Louisiana Ins.
  • State v. Barber 654 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    5th Cir.1992), writ denied
  • State v. Gaines 639 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1992), writ denied, defendant argues that the state cannot "piggyback" felony convictions in order to avoid the five-year cleansing period.
  • State v. Richardson 637 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1992), writ denied, the Fifth Circuit appears to hold that the expiration of the maximum sentence of each of the predicate felony convictions must be within five years of commission of the offense which is being enhanced, in order to use the predicate offense for enhancement.
  • Distinguished Settle v. Settle 635 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    App. 3d Cir.1992), writ denied
  • Hildebrand v. Hildebrand 626 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3d Cir.1992), writ denied, we concluded the trial court erred in its calculation of child support based on "flawed income data."
  • Bertrand v. Bertrand 637 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, the third circuit again affirmed the lower court's judgment finding no abuse of discretion; however, in this case the lower court's ruling excluded the child's tuition at a private school from the father's monthly child support obligation.