Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Ventre, 613 So. 2d 992.
-
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc.
223 So. 3d 1202
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
App. 3 Cir. 1992), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. Davis
786 So. 2d 834
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir.1991), writ denied, State v. Kendrick, 96-1636 (La.App.
-
State v. Howard
786 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir.1991), writ denied, State v. Kendrick, 96-1636 (La.App.
-
Bellard v. Castille
759 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 Cir.1992), writ denied
-
Steed v. ST. PAUL'S UNITED METH. CHURCH
728 So. 2d 931
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
3d Cir.1992), writ denied (1993); Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.
-
Martin v. Martin
716 So. 2d 46
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3rd Cir.1992), writ denied
-
Valure v. Valure
696 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3rd Cir.1992), writ denied
-
State v. Finley
664 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
5 Cir.1992), writ denied
-
State v. Webster
664 So. 2d 624
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
5th Cir.1992), writ denied, defendant argues that the state cannot `piggyback' felony convictions in order to avoid the five-year cleansing period.
-
Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc.
663 So. 2d 755
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Group, Inc., (3 Cir.1992), writ denied and writ denied Veillon v. Louisiana Ins.
-
State v. Barber
654 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
5th Cir.1992), writ denied
-
State v. Gaines
639 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
5th Cir.1992), writ denied, defendant argues that the state cannot "piggyback" felony convictions in order to avoid the five-year cleansing period.
-
State v. Richardson
637 So. 2d 709
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
5th Cir.1992), writ denied, the Fifth Circuit appears to hold that the expiration of the maximum sentence of each of the predicate felony convictions must be within five years of commission of the offense which is being enhanced, in order to use the predicate offense for enhancement.
-
Distinguished
Settle v. Settle
635 So. 2d 456
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
App. 3d Cir.1992), writ denied
-
Hildebrand v. Hildebrand
626 So. 2d 578
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.1992), writ denied, we concluded the trial court erred in its calculation of child support based on "flawed income data."
-
Bertrand v. Bertrand
637 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, the third circuit again affirmed the lower court's judgment finding no abuse of discretion; however, in this case the lower court's ruling excluded the child's tuition at a private school from the father's monthly child support obligation.