Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cole v. Celotex Corp., 620 So. 2d 1154.

67 citing documents.

Canal Street Land Company, LLC v. Mapp Construction, LLC, Mpt of New Orleans Fcer, LLC and Ochsner Clinic, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
James Guerin v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, successor or assignee of The Traveler's Insurance Company; Exxon Mobil Corporation; … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Cole u Celotex Corp., ( La.
Martha May Lee v. American Supply Co La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Duane G. Tower v. Conocophillips Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“Damage is sustained, within the meaning of prescription, only when it has manifested itself with sufficient certainty to support the accrual of a cause of action.”
David Defelice, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Son, Pascal Hondroulis, and Katie Hondroulis Versus Federated National … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Tenorio, 170 So.3d at 274, (La.
Howell Constr., Inc. v. Andry Lerner, L.L.C. 258 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cole v. Celotex Corp. , 1156 (La.
Blanchard v. Gerry's Place, Inc. 258 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Cole v. Celotex Corp. , , 1156 (La.
Steven Trahan v. Bp America Production Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Trahan v. BP America Production Co. 209 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lapuyade v. Rawbar, Inc. 190 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The fourth category, also known as the discovery rule, “prevents the running of liberative prescription where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by thé plaintiff.”
Tenorio v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 170 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Blevins v. Long Trusts 162 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Raborn v. Albea 144 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(citing McCray v. New England Ins.
Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 102 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The fourth category, also known as the discovery rule, “prevents the running of liberative prescription where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by the plaintiff.”
Ames v. Ohle 97 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 83 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Becker v. Murphy Oil Corp. 70 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The doctrine “prevents the running of liberative prescription where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by the plaintiff.”
Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 52 F.3d 524 (5th Cir.1995) (Plaintiff cannot learn of damages suffered until many years after exposure); (Damage is considered to have been sustained only when it has manifested itself with sufficient certainty to support the accrual of the cause of action); Watkins v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc., (La.App.
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Charles Glisan, Et Ux. v. Michael Eaton, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Glisan v. Eaton 30 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Dunham 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Reynolds Tobacco Company, 52 F.3d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1995) ( (La.
Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc. 13 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Alexander v. Fulco, 39,293 (La.App.
Glenn M. Hebert v. J. Elise Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
the Louisiana Supreme Court articulated as follows: The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio prevents the running of liberative prescription where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by t
Hebert v. Shelton 11 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the Louisiana Supreme Court articulated as follows: The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio prevents the running of liberative prescription where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by the plaintiff.
Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc. 2 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Alexander v. Fulco, 39,293 (La.App.
State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Education-Food Service v. Bright Beginnings Child Care, Inc. 957 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Martinez Management, Inc. v. Caston, 39,500 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/05), .
Doe v. BRIGHT BEGINNINGS CHILD CARE 957 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Shermohmad v. Ebrahimi 945 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Cole v. Celotex Corp., 93-90 (La.7/1/93), .
Martinez Management, Inc. v. Caston 900 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Alexander v. Fulco 895 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Khoury 891 So. 2d 1268 La. 2005
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 865 So. 2d 49 La. 2004
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 52 F.3d 524 (5 Cir.1995) [Plaintiff cannot learn of damages suffered until many years after exposure]; [Damage is considered to have been sustained only when it has manifested itself with sufficient certainty to support the accrual of the cause of action]; Watkins v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc., (La.App.
Ducote v. Touro Infirmary 860 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Hughes v. Olin Corp. 856 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Klein v. American Life & Cas. Co. 858 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Mudd v. Christus Health Northern Louisiana 850 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Bourque v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SYSTEMS CORP. 845 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 844 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 838 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Ethyl Corp. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc. 836 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Brunett v. Dep't of Wildlife and Fisheries, 96-0535, 96-0536 (La.
Pratt v. Himel Marine, Inc. 823 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hardy v. EASY TV & APPLIANCES OF LOUISIANA, INC. 804 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Martin v. State, Charity Hospital & Medical Center of Louisiana ex rel. Louisiana Health Care Authority 811 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Stewart Const. Co., Inc. 780 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Smith v. Mine Safety Appliances, 93-706 (La.App.