Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hunter v. Dept. of Transp. and Dev., 620 So. 2d 1149.

58 citing documents.

Vernon Martin v. City of Crowley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Martin v. City of Crowley 269 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Roger Vestal v. Cynthia D. Kirkland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Vestal v. Kirkland 81 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Tonya Lynn Boudreaux v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Forbes v. Cockerham 5 So. 3d 839 La. 2009
Tassin v. Bendel 989 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
& Dev., 93-0235 (La.7/01/93), ; see also, Netecke, 98-1182, 98-1197 at pp. 7-9; 747 So.2d at 494-95 .
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Denton v. Vidrine 951 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
and Development of State of La., (1993), for the proposition that the section of Hwy.
Denton v. Vidrine 947 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
and Development of State of La., (1993), for the proposition that the section of Hwy.
Woods v. STATE, DOTD 852 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In Hunter v. State, DOTD, 93-0235 (La.1/1/95), , DOTD's liability was based upon the finding that a five-mile stretch of Highway 190, which had a four-foot wide median, was unreasonably dangerous to left-turning motorists.
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Lockett v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 844 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Hunter v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Updegraff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
and Dev., Miller v. State Dept. of Transp.
Updegraff v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
and Dev., Miller v. State Dept. of Transp.
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 817 So. 2d 1107 La. 2002
Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
App. 1st Cir.4/4/96), , 1001
Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
and Dev., -51 (La.1993).
Whitcraft v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 771 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Cuevas v. City of New Orleans 769 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
& Dev., 93-0235 (La.7/1/93) .
McReynolds v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 765 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lee v. State, Through DOTD, 97-0350 (La.10/21/97)
Niven v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 751 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
DOTD has a duty to build and maintain highways in a reasonably safe condition, and whether it breached this duty depends on the circumstances of the particular case
Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 752 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
“Design standards both at the time of the original construction and at the time of the accident may be relevant factors for consideration in deciding this issue, but are not determinative.” Hunter v. State, Through DOTD, Dill v. State, Through DOTD
Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 747 So. 2d 489 La. 1999
& Dev., Oster, 582 So.2d at 1291 ; (La.
Cormier v. Comeaux 748 So. 2d 1123 La. 1999
and Development of State of La., (narrow median for left hand turns was joint cause of accident, DOTD had duty to bring up to AASHTO standards because highway underwent a major reconstruction).
Pesson v. Reynolds 727 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Deville v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
& Dev., Dill v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
Ledoux v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 43 La. 1998
Cormier v. Comeaux 714 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
& Dev., : In order to determine whether liability exists, a duty-risk analysis is used.
Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
Graves v. Page 703 So. 2d 566 La. 1997
1/17/95); -51 (La.1993); [3] The plaintiff must prove custody, defect and causation and DOTD must have knowledge of the hazardous condition.
Grissette v. Thomas 704 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
and Development, the Supreme Court indirectly addressed the issue of the standard of review to be applied to a lower court's determination that a condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm.
Goodliffe v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 702 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Miller v. DOTD, supra; Begnaud v. DOTD, supra.
Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler 701 So. 2d 1308 La. 1997
Lee v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 701 So. 2d 676 La. 1997
Thompson v. Coates 694 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
9:2800; Faulkner v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, 25,857 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/26/94), , writ denied, 94-2908 (La.
Brown v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 693 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Patterson v. State 685 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Thornhill v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 676 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Shephard ex rel. Shephard v. Scheeler 674 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Ryland, supra; Manasco v. Poplus, 430 (sic) So.2d 548 (La.1988); Myers v. State Farm Mut.
Gibson v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
& Dev., -1151 (La.1993).
Gibson v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
& Dev., -1151 (La.1993).
Miller v. STATE, DOTD 679 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Tullis v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 670 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996