Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, 624 So. 2d 874.

97 citing documents.

Robin Allen v. First Castle Federal Credit Union La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
1993), and rev' d on other grounds, ( La.
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 239 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
and Development , , 881 (La.
Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C. v. Cynthia Bridges, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue 223 So. 3d 488 La. 2017
Brandy Lynn Fecke, Stephen C. Fecke, and Karen Fecke v. the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University … 217 So. 3d 237 La. 2016
Harper v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 176 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, the Louisiana Supreme Court declared the statute to be unconstitutional, finding that it conflicted with Article XII, Section 10(A) of the Louisiana Constitution.
canal/claiborne, Limited v. Stonehedge Development, LLC 156 So. 3d 627 La. 2014
and Dev’t, 93-472 (La.9/3/93), .
Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 68 So. 3d 499 La. 2011
and Development, Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
Board of Directors v. All Taxpayers 938 So. 2d 11 La. 2006
and Development, (1993).
WORLD TRADE CENTER v. All Taxpayers 908 So. 2d 623 La. 2005
Biggers v. Allstate Ins. Co. 886 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[5] Reeder, supra, citing Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD
Williams v. Webre 876 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, ” Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree, 97-1256, p. 3 (La.1/21/98), .
Lockett v. STATE, DOTD 869 So. 2d 87 La. 2004
and Development, superceded by 1995 La.
Engles v. City of New Orleans 872 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, the Louisiana Supreme Court declared the statute to be unconstitutional, finding that it conflicted with Article XII, Section 10(A) of the Louisiana Constitution.
Chamberlain Ex Rel. Wilmer J. v. Kennedy 868 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, and Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 91-1942 (La.App.
Huber v. Midkiff 838 So. 2d 771 La. 2003
[7] Reeder v. *777 North, 97-0239 (La.1997); ; In Re Medical Review Panel of Harris, 97-1970 (La.App.
Distinguished St. Mary Anesthesia v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. 836 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
We distinguish the cases of cited by SMA, on the grounds that the scope of the constitutional grants of legislative power at issue were clearly less broad than that of Section 3's proviso.
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (superseded by 1995 Constitutional Amendment).
Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (superseded by 1995 Constitutional Amendment).
Armand v. State Department of Health & Human Resources 822 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Vallien v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 812 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Relying on this constitutional provision, the supreme court, in Chamberlain v. State, Through Department of Transportation & Development, (La.
Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Chamberlain v. State, through DOTD
Wiley v. City of New Orleans 809 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
13:5112 do not apply to cases, such as this, which were still pending between the time that these statutes were declared unconstitutional by Chamberlain [ v. State Department of Transportation and Development (1993), ] and Rick and the effective date of the amendment to La.
Cox v. Moore 805 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
which *292 held that the $500,000 cap was unconstitutional when applied to this 1989 accident, we find that this argument has no merit.
Curole v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 798 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
1993), reversed on other grounds, on remand, 91-1942 (La.App.
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
and Dev., that the cap on general damages in favor of the state was unconstitutional.
Ruttley v. Lee 761 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
See, e.g., Chamberlain v, State, Through D.O.T.D., (no recovery when victim's parents learned of accident from others).
Castille v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
In Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, the Louisiana Supreme Court declared the statute to be unconstitutional, finding that it conflicted with Article XII, Section 10(A) of the Louisiana Constitution.
In Re Succession of Boyter 756 So. 2d 1122 La. 2000
and Dev., by parsing each subsection of old Article XII, Section 10.
Jacobs v. City of Bunkie 737 So. 2d 14 La. 1999
and Development, found La.
Trahan v. McManus 728 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
See, e.g., Chamberlain v. State, Through D.O.T.D., (no recovery when victim's parents learned of accident from others).
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 728 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
and Development, Lejeune recovery was denied when the mother was telephoned several hours after her son's accident and the father, who was fishing offshore at the time of the accident, was notified of the accident by water patrol.
Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 727 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
and Development, as the basis for their argument that the statutory cap violates the proscription against sovereign immunity.
Conerly v. State 714 So. 2d 709 La. 1998
and Development, (stating the legislative goal prompting the enactment of La.
Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. Foster 711 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, .
Brown v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 715 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Caddo-Shreveport Sales & Use Tax Com'n v. OMV THROUGH DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY AND CORRS. 710 So. 2d 776 La. 1998
Kimball v. Allstate Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 46 La. 1998
and Development, referring to Duree v. Maryland Casualty Co., 238 La.
Guinn v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 708 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, (La.
Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree 707 So. 2d 12 La. 1998
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD
Reeder v. North 701 So. 2d 1291 La. 1997
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD, ( (collecting cases); n. 5 (La.1986)).
Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals 703 So. 2d 579 La. 1997
On the final day of trial, June 30, 1994, the plaintiffs hand-delivered a letter and a to the State, advising them that they were challenging the $500,000 statutory cap placed on monetary damages in medical malpractice cases.
Baudoin v. Acadia Parish Police Jury 702 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Chamberlain v. State, through DOTD
Meredith v. Ieyoub 700 So. 2d 478 La. 1997
Brown v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 693 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
13:5106(B)(1) unconstitutional in Chamberlain v. State, Through Department of Transportation & Development
Conerly v. State 690 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Thus, a cap limiting the state's liability to $500,000 under La.R.S.
Lewis v. State 685 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
This cap was declared unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Farley v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. 680 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
This cap was later declared unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Chamberlain v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development
Farley v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 680 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
This cap was later declared unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Chamberlain v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development