DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 625 So. 2d 1019.

13 citing documents.

  • Kelley D. Wyatt and Jeffrey L. Wyatt, Individually and on Behalf of Their Children, Jacob L. Wyatt and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • Ellis v. McDonald 265 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Lonny Hayes v. Viviana Trevino De Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    10/28/1993), where the supreme court held that even though the plaintiff‟s employer‟s multiperil policy did not provide auto coverage, the employer‟s umbrella policy provided UM coverage because no valid waiver existed and the umbrella policy “provided „comprehensive general liability‟ coverage, including automobile insurance
  • Hayes v. De Barton 211 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/28/1993), , where the supreme court held that even though the plaintiffs employer’s multiperil policy did not provide auto coverage, the employer’s umbrella policy provided UM coverage because no valid waiver existed and the umbrella policy “provided ‘comprehensive general liability* coverage, including automobile insurance for
  • Bordelon v. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., to support its ruling.
  • Criticized Savant v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 725 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Co., this court has previously discussed this precise issue and held that the valid rejection of or reduction in UM coverage may occur after the issuance of an insurance policy.
  • White v. Shoalmire 706 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    so labeled by two of the four concurring justices, a rejection of UM coverage signed before the date of the accident giving rise to the UM claim is not rendered invalid by the fact that it was not executed contemporaneously with the insurance application or the policy's issuance.
  • New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Gowen 699 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Co., requires that a waiver of UM coverage or selection of lower UM limits must be executed contemporaneously with either the application or with the issuance of the insurance policy.
  • Henderson v. Maloid 683 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Moyles v. Cruz 682 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Deville v. Allstate Ins. Co. 688 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Co., argued selection of lower limits must be made at the time the policy is issued.
  • Futch v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Overruled Wallace v. Weavers Underwriting Agency 633 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994