Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 642 So. 2d 1243.

30 citing documents.

c/w 2022-cc-00539 c/w 2022-cc-00730 La. 2023
New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company v. American Midstream (Louisiana Intrastate), L.L.C. and American Midstream Partnership, L.P. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Anthony James Landry v. Guzzino Commercial, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Marty Melerine and Oyster Fisheries, Inc. v. Tom's Marine & Salvage, LLC, Tom's Welding, Inc., Triple T Marine, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
9/6/94), a decision reached before the legislature enacted La.
Seth H. Schaumburg Versus Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Yokum v. 544 Funky, LLC 202 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Code art. 2315.” Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), .
Badke v. USA Speedway, LLC 139 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), ; Barrett v. T.L.
Yokum v. Nicholas S. Karno II, Inc. 126 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
where the Louisiana Supreme Court de *731 fined the term “proprietor” as used in La.
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681, p. 11 (La.9/6/94), .
Distinguished Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 977 So. 2d 859 La. 2008
Further, the Court of Appeal in this matter also found this Court's decision in Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94); , [24] factually distinguishable, *870 as it involved a dispute between two lessees.
Gautreau v. Trahan 971 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-681 (La.9/6/94), .
Brent D. Gautreau, Et Ux. v. Paul M. Trahan, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 960 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Additionally, we find no language in Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), , stating or implying either in the holding or in dicta that the lessor-owner has La.
Explained Louisiana Crawfish Producers Assoc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Explained LA. CRAWFISH PRODUC. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 935 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Plaintiffs also contend that they have a cause of action under La.Civ.Code art. 667, [4] arguing that their fishing licenses *385 place them in the category of "persons holding rights derived from the landowner," as were the successful oyster lessees in Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-681, p. 12 (La.9/6/94), .
Steinberg v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 927 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Parish of East Feliciana v. Guidry 923 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Inabnet v. Exxon Corporation, 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), .
Avenal v. State 886 So. 2d 1085 La. 2004
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), .
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 858 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded Inabnet in part (presumably influenced by Judge Landrieu's dissent), Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), , stating, inter alia, that: Because the parties may have been misled in this regard [the measure of damages] by previous intermediate court decisions, it is appropriate to remand the case to the district court for further evidence and for a decision on this issue.
Spiker v. City of Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681, p. 12 (La.9/6/94), .
Jurisich v. Jenkins 749 So. 2d 597 La. 1999
4 Cir.1979); see also Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), (Kimball, J., dissenting in part).
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 728 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), .
Bartlett v. Browning-Ferris Industries 683 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Inabnet v. Exxon Corporation, 93-0681 (La.9/6/94), ; Critney v. Goodyear Tire and *1324 Rubber Company, (La.App.
Barrett v. TL James & Co. 671 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Haworth v. L'Hoste 664 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Sercovich v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 655 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. 650 So. 2d 712 La. 1995
Sercovich v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 644 So. 2d 379 La. 1994
The judgments of the trial court and court of appeal are vacated, and the ease remanded to the court of appeal for consideration in light of Inabnet v. Exxon Corporation, 93-C-0681 (La., 9/6/94)