DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs, 640 So. 2d 237.

295 citing documents.

  • Pitre v. Dufrene 726 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-069 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Vallier v. Louisiana Health Systems, Inc. 722 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Comm'rs, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance 720 So. 2d 1186 La. 1998
    In support of their arguments, the City cites this Court's opinions in City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), (holding that every Home Rule Charter in existence before the adoption of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 is limited only to the extent that the home rule is inconsistent with the 1974 Constitution); Cox Cable New Orleans, (holding that the City of New Orleans' t
  • King v. Caddo Parish Com'n 719 So. 2d 410 La. 1998
    Charles Gaming Co., Inc. v. Riverboat Gaming, 94-2697 (La.1/17/95); ; City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94); ; Folsom Road Civic Association v. Parish of St.
  • Smith v. ST. TAMMANY FIRE PROTECTION DIST. NO. 1. 723 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94); ; Woodland Ridge Association v. Cangelosi , 94-2604, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Kewaunee Scientific Corp. v. RAGUSA & SON 723 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Ultra Fabricators, Inc. v. MC BANK 724 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 28 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Byers v. Edmondson 712 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94), ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 691 So.2d at 754 .
  • Nelson v. Williams 707 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    as follows: In reviewing a trial court's ruling sustaining an exception of no cause of action, the court of appeal and this court should subject the case to de novo review because the exception raises a question of law and the lower court's decision is based only on the sufficiency of the petition.
  • Atwell v. National Safety Consultants, Inc. 713 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Comm'rs., 93-0690 (La.7/5/94); .
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum 709 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In City of New Orleans v. Board of Comm’rs of the New Orleans Levee Dist., 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), , the Orleans Levee District (OLD) began construction of a marina and related developments for commercial profit on state-owned land inside the City of New Orleans without complying with New Orleans’ zoning and building ordinances.
  • White v. Fetzer 707 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-690 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Capital City Towing & Recovery, Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge 709 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94); ; Woodland Ridge Association v. Cangelosi, 94-2604, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Bland v. Bland 705 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94); ; Treasure Chest, 691 So.2d at 754 .
  • Walters v. Rubicon Inc. 706 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District 93-0690, p. 29 (La.7/5/94); .
  • 7004 St. Charles Ave. Corp. v. City of New Orleans 704 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Sivils v. Mitchell 704 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    7/5/94), ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 691 So.2d at 754 .
  • La. Associated Gen. Contracters, Inc. v. No Aviation Bd. 701 So. 2d 130 La. 1997
    See also City of Baton Rouge v. Blakeley, 96-1742 (La.9/9/97), ; State v. Saizan, 96-1340 (La.4/8/97), ; City of Baton Rouge v. Williams, 95-0308 (La.10/16/95), ; City of Baton Rouge v. Ross, 94-0695 (La.4/28/95), ; City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Caronia v. McKenzie's Pastry Shoppes 700 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Blakely 699 So. 2d 1053 La. 1997
    In City of New Orleans v. Board of Com’rs, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), , this court addressed the ability of the City of New Orleans, which like Baton Rouge is also a home rule municipality, to initiate legislation under the 1974 Constitution: There are three primary, interrelated sources of the CNO’s power to initiate legislation and regulation: Article VI, § 4 of the 1974 state constit
  • Stalter v. 700 South Peters Street Partnership 696 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    \iCity of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners, No. 93-0690 (7/5/94), (emphasis added).
  • State v. Saizan 692 So. 2d 1045 La. 1997
    Commenting on this article, we stated in City of Baton Rouge v. Ross, 94-0695 (La.4/28/95); : In City of New Orleans [v. Board of Com'rs, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94); ], we concluded that Article VI, § 4 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 provided not only that those Home Rule Charter governments [like the City-Parish government of Baton Rouge] existing prior to our 1974 constitution retained the power they had exercised under the 1921 constitution, but also that they retained t
  • TREASURE CHEST v. Parish of Jefferson 691 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94); ; Woodland Ridge Association v. Cangelosi, 94-2604, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Keys v. Broussard 692 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    In City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 93-0690 (La.7/5/94); , the supreme court stated: The purpose of an exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • City of New Orleans v. BOARD OF COM'RS 694 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Riley v. Riley 680 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Haspel & Davis v. Bd. of Levee Com'rs 680 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Vogt v. Board of Levee Com'rs 680 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Pappy's Investment Group of Lake Charles, Inc. v. City of Lake Charles 677 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    7/5/94); , involving an ordinance “in existence when the 1974 Louisiana Constitution was adopted,” is thereby distinguished.
  • Thomas v. Armstrong World Industries 676 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners, 93-0690, p. 2 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Perry v. First National Bank of Jefferson 673 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Downs v. RTS Sec., Inc. 670 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Williams 661 So. 2d 445 La. 1995
  • Twin Parish Port Com'n v. Berry Bros., Inc. 663 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Lacking constitutional or statutory authority, the Commission, a non-home rule charter political subdivision, Cf., City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs, 93-0690 (7/5/94), , [9] was powerless to enact Ordinance No. 10, which not only restricts where an activity permitted by state law may occur, but prevents its very occurrence.
  • Craft v. Allstate Ins. Co. 663 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Foster v. Kemp 657 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • GNC Ltd. Partnership v. Dooley 657 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94); ] and should be sustained only if the law affords no remedy for the grievance asserted under any evidence admissible under the pleadings.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
    For such an entity different rules apply, as we recently stated in City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs, No. 93-C-0690
  • Edgecombe v. Board of Levee Commissioners 650 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (citations omitted).
  • SECURITY CENTER PROTECTION SERV., INC. v. All-Pro Security, Inc. 650 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    7/5/94); (citations omitted).
  • Perrier v. Bistes 650 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (citations omitted).
  • St. Charles Gaming v. Riverboat Gaming 648 So. 2d 1310 La. 1995
  • Police Ass'n of New Orleans v. New Orleans 649 So. 2d 951 La. 1995
  • Jackson v. Ferrand 658 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    7/5/94); (citations omitted).
  • Lafourche Parish Council v. Autin 648 So. 2d 343 La. 1994
    7/5/94), [discussion of Dillon's Rule]; 23 Loy.L.Rev.