Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., 630 So. 2d 759.

331 citing documents.

Thomas v. Albertsons, Inc. 685 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Certain basic principals regarding interpretation of insurance polices were enunciated *1137 by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., 93-C-0911 (La.1/14/94), .
Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., 93-911 (La.1/14/94); .
Colver v. Travelers Ins. Companies 685 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, 93-0911 p. 5 (La.1/14/94); .
Bryant v. Motwani 683 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Collinsworth v. Foster 680 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
1/14/94), ; Jefferson v. Monumental General Ins.
Michelet v. Scheuring SEC. Services Inc. 680 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, 93-0911 (La.1/14/94), .
Losavio v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 675 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
1/14/94) , wherein the Court enunciated several elementary principles regarding construction of insurance policies: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed by using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
Jones v. Doe 673 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
1/14/94); ; Gaspard v. Northfield Ins.
Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Crigler v. Crigler 671 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
01/14/94), : An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed by using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
Dubois v. PARISH GOV. RISK AGENCY-GROUP HEALTH 670 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ledbetter v. Concord General Corp. 665 So. 2d 1166 La. 1996
Bailey v. Robert v. Neuhoff Ltd. Partnership 665 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Valentine 665 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
UNITED INVESTORS LIFE v. Alexander 662 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Turner v. Pelican 661 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
1/14/94), , is more analogous to the situation in the instant case.
Lafayette Ins. v. Ce Albert Const. Co. 661 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
1/14/94), , citing Oceanonics, ).
Martin v. Champion Ins. Co. 656 So. 2d 991 La. 1995
Young v. Brown 658 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
01/14/94), : An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed by using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
Lewis v. Hamilton 652 So. 2d 1327 La. 1995
Jones v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 648 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Maynor v. Vosburg 648 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
01/14/94), ; Benton v. Long Manufacturing N.C., Inc., (La.App.
Gaspard v. Northfield Ins. Co. 649 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
La.Civ.Code art. 2047; Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
Hebert v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest 649 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
2/28/94); Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. 634 So. 2d 1180 La. 1994
Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., 93-0911, p. 5
Scordill v. Smith 635 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Co., 829 S.W.2d 589 , 590 n. 2 (Mo.App.1992)
Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co. 632 So. 2d 736 La. 1994
1/14/94), ; Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of La.
Jack v. Champion Insurance Co. 640 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994