Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 633 So. 2d 129.

357 citing documents.

Langley v. Bechtel Co. 708 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Cochennic v. Dillard’s Dept. Store Warehouse, 668 So.2d at 1161 .
Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. 708 So. 2d 375 La. 1998
Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, *381 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
Kahlden v. Horseshoe Entertainment 709 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. 704 So. 2d 1161 La. 1997
Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal 696 So. 2d 551 La. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
Lafrance v. Custom Built Torque Convertors 694 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Cochennic v. Dillard’s Dept. Store Warehouse, 668 So.2d at 1161 .
Bastoe v. Burger King Distribution Srv. 691 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.02/28/94), .
Johnson v. Apeck Const., Inc. 692 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
2/28/94); -133 (notes omitted).
Daigrepont v. Grand Casino Avoyelles 692 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94); .
Simon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 689 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), .
Tyler v. Rockwood Insurance Co. 690 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 3 (La.2/28/94), ; Kennedy v. Security Industrial Ins.
Ward v. Bonne Idee Aero Service, Inc. 687 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Bigner v. LSU Medical Center, 27,084 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/21/95), .
Tiffin Inn Pancake House v. LeBlanc 687 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
in which the hearing officer concluded that the compensation claimant was “restricted more by his trepidation than by his disability.” The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed, stating (at page 133) that an employer trying to defeat or reduce supplemental earnings benefits bears the burden of proving that the e
Dupree v. Ace Home & Auto 685 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
23:1221(3); Smith v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94); .
Livings v. LANGSTON COMPANIES 685 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Our supreme court stated in Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94); , that a claimant is not required to accept employment that would put him or her at risk of harm.
Rapp v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/96); ; and as expressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, (La.2/28/94); , we shall not follow them.
Pfister v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See also Smith v. Louisiana Department of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), .
Lytle v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, (La.2/28/94), .
Rivera v. West Jefferson Medical Center 678 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Courville v. Omni Drilling 676 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2/28/94); ; Woolley v. CAS Refining, Inc., 94-648 (La.App.
Laumann v. Dulac Shipyard, Inc. 676 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Clark v. Clark Trucking 679 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed *160 Eater, 93-1530 (La.
Perrodin v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 676 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Our conclusion is buttressed by the characterization in the Smith [ v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections ] case [94-1305 *617 (La.2/28/94); ] of the question of entitlement to SEB as a "facts and circumstances one".
Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza 674 So. 2d 947 La. 1996
2/28/94), , by proving it had offered, and Mr. Daugherty had accepted and worked at, a light-duty job at the Domino's facility in Baton Rouge, the same place plaintiff had worked prior to sustaining his injury.
Smith v. Hamp Enterprises, Inc. 673 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Fortune v. Charbonnet-Labat Funeral Home 671 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2/28/94), ; Reed v. Direct Installers, 95-CA-1684 (La.App.
Reed v. Direct Installers 669 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2/28/94), ; Garner v. Sheats & Frazier, 95-39 (La.
Creel v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 670 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Mullins v. Courtney Equipment 670 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
23:1221(3); Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94); .
Pierce v. Louisiana Maintenance Service, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.
Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse 668 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Bass v. National Maintenance Corp. 665 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Henry v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 665 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted the statute as follows: Entitlement to supplemental earnings benefits is governed by LSA-R.S.
Helaire v. Louisiana School for Math, Science & Arts 664 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
2/28/94), ; Tassin v. Cigna Ins.
Fontenot v. Trans Gulf, Inc. 664 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
2/28/94); ; Daigle, 545 So.2d at 1007 .
Davis v. Jones Baldwin Music Co. 662 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Mason v. Auto Convoy 662 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2/28/94), *846 ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.
Warren v. Progressive Healthcare Providers 664 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Morris v. Reve, Inc. 662 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
2/28/94), is as follows: In a worker's compensation case, as in other cases, the appellate court's review is governed by the manifest error or clearly wrong standard.
Hurst v. Baker Sand Control 671 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Fontenette v. McDermott, Inc. 694 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Mitchell v. Dixie Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 663 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Garner v. Sheats & Frazier 663 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Creekmore v. Elco Maintenance 659 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
2/28/94), , and that the factfinder's choice between two permissible views of the evidence cannot be clearly wrong, "it was not [the supreme court's] purpose ...
Bigner v. LSU Medical Center 658 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
02/28/94), ; Lubom v. L.J.
Smith v. Morehouse General Hosp. 658 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Comeaux v. Sam Broussard Trucking 657 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
2/28/94), ; Belaire v. L & L Oil Co., 93-1198 (La.App.
Thomas v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 653 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
2/28/94), the court characterized the analysis as to whether an employee has carried her burden of proof to establish entitlement to SEB as "a facts and circumstances one" and restated the principle that the law should be liberally construed in favor of coverage.
Herty v. City of New Orleans 654 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Kampen v. Conway Southwest Exp. 655 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995