DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 639 So. 2d 224.

139 citing documents.

  • Timmons v. Silman 761 So. 2d 507 La. 2000
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -27 .
  • Alexander v. Hall 759 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Johnson v. Templeton 768 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); -27 , instructed: Whether an employee is within the course and scope of his employment is a question that is only answerable by general rules, because of the unending contexts in which the question may arise.
  • Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 752 So. 2d 815 La. 2000
    Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -227 , citing W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 70 (5th ed.1984).
  • Ragland v. Hodge 748 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -227 .
  • Ligeikis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 745 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Soileau v. D & J Tire Inc., 97-318 (La.App.
  • Timmons v. Silman 743 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Alford, supra.
  • Doe v. Louisiana Mun. Ass'n 746 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94) .
  • Bell v. Hurstell 743 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    7/5/94); ; Gordon v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • Wright v. Skate Country, Inc. 734 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96), ; Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Alford v. STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO. 734 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Billiot v. Terrebonne Sheriff's Office 735 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Wynder v. Royal Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. 721 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 5 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Hanson v. Benelli 719 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Baumeister, 673 So.2d at 996 ; Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Roger v. Dufrene 718 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Plaintiffs wanted the trial court to read instructions to the jury, stating that whether an employee is within the course and scope of his employment is a question that is only answerable by general rules, because of the unending contexts in which the question may arise, citing Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Doe v. Parauka 714 So. 2d 701 La. 1998
    Civ.Code art. 2320; Orgeron, on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), , [3] the court found that the plaintiffs' claim under vicarious liability must fail.
  • Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 713 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Harrington v. La. State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Educ. 714 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Landry v. Fincke 714 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Allen v. Payne & Keller Co., Inc. 710 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    [12] Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Washington v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    In Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, pp.4-5 (La.7/5/94), -227 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the doctrine of respondeat superior and noted that generally an employee who is traveling from home to work or returning from work to home is not within the course and scope of his employment: An employer is answerable for the damage occasioned by his servant in the exe
  • Matlock v. Hankel 707 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    The Supreme Court, in Orgeron, on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 pp. 5-8 (La.7/5/94), , 227-28 has held that the "going and coming rule," under which an employee's travel from home to work and back is not usually considered to be within the course and scope of his employment, is not inflexible when the employee does not work on the employer's premises or have a fixed place of work.
  • Russell v. Noullet 706 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Bergeron v. Mar-Con, Inc. 705 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Aycock v. Jenkins Tile Co. 703 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Soileau v. D & J Tire, Inc. 702 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Bertrand v. Bollich 695 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Maze v. Grogan 694 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 4 (La.7/5/94); .
  • Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training 687 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Kennedy v. Martin Gas Transp. Co., Inc. 680 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Landreneau v. Fruge 676 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    7/5/94); , citing Reed v. House of Decor, Inc.
  • Baumeister v. Plunkett 673 So. 2d 994 La. 1996
  • Busby v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    7/5/94); ; Emoakemeh v. Southern University, 94-1194 (La.App.
  • Timmons v. Silman 675 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Norlander v. Illinois National Insurance Co. 672 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • McLain v. Safeway Insurance 662 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Benoit v. Roche 657 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Hebert v. Jeffrey 653 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , dictates a finding that Mr. Hebert was within the course and scope of his employment at the time he was injured.
  • Emoakemeh v. Southern University 654 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995