Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp., 627 So. 2d 1358.

25 citing documents.

  • Rozina Amlani v. Rocky James McGee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Mr. McGee argues that if he shows that Mr. Amlani was in the wrong lane at the time of the collision, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to exculpate him from fault
  • Amlani v. McGee 135 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Mr. McGee argues that if he shows that Mr. Amlani was in the wrong lane at the time of the collision, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to exculpate him from fault
  • Daniels v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance 92 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), ; Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp., 93-1355 (La.11/29/93), -63 .
  • Gatlin v. KLEINHEITZ 34 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp., 93-1355, 93-1459 (La.11/29/93), ; King, 543 So.2d at 1331 .
  • Cooley v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 862 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    *254 plaintiffs argue that the Sudden Emergency Doctrine is not applicable.
  • Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
    see also Mallery v. International Harvester Co., 96-321 (La.App.
  • Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    [6] This case was reversed in part by the Supreme Court, but the opinion of the Supreme Court made no mention of the problem of conflicting results in bifurcated trials.
  • Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 741 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    the driver of a pickup truck stopped her vehicle on an icy highway late at night to offer assistance to another motorist and failed to activate her hazard lights.
  • LeBlanc v. Steptore 723 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    writ denied, 94-2220 (La.11/18/94); , for the proposition that since a truck driver is a professional operator he is in a superior position with respect to this fourth Watson factor.
  • Legros v. Westlake Polymers Corp. 704 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    App. 2 Cir.), writ granted, affirmed in part, vacated in part, on remand, 24386 (La.App.
  • Bockman v. Caraway 691 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Porter v. Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. 692 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Harvey v. Traylor 688 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Hollenbeck v. Oceaneering Intern., Inc. 685 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2nd Cir.), vacated in part on other grounds, Pugh, Force, Rault, and Triche, Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law (1996).
  • Bannerman v. Bishop 688 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    writ granted, , affirmed in part, vacated in part, , rehearing denied, on remand, 24,386 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/4/94), , on rehearing in part, writ denied, 94-2220 (La.
  • Hurts v. Woodis 676 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    In response to the objection, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court, in apportioning fault *1174 among various parties, including professional truck drivers, stated: Examining the parties' [respective] fault under the guidelines in Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • Busby v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2d Cir.), modified on other grounds
  • Spiller v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 668 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    : “When a driver on his wrong side of the road collides with another car which is in its correct lane of traffic, the driver is required to exculpate himself of any fault, however slight, contributing to the accident.” ().
  • Whiddon v. Hutchinson 668 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Marigny v. Allstate Ins. Co. 667 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Mayo v. Audubon Indem. Ins. Co. 666 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • In Re Medical Review Panel 657 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    2nd Cir.1993), aff'd in part, vacated in part
  • Southern Message Service, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    writ granted , , two cases, affirmed in part, vacated in part, , rehearing denied.
  • Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. 639 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    The higher court agreed with our -holding finding error in the trial *302 court’s belief that the tort action and the intervention represented separate causes of action, .
  • Stafford v. Hearn Const. Co., Inc. 632 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993