DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 630 So. 2d 689.

96 citing documents.

  • Meneses v. IFCO Systems, Inc. 923 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • Truitt v. Temp Staffers 915 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    He further contends that in determining whether his benefits should be modified, he is entitled to the legal presumption that his condition *795 is related to the work accident, citing Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Tuckerson v. Holiday Retirement Corp. 892 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    23:1221(3)(a); Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al, 93-1402, p. 5-6
  • Autin v. Wal-Mart 896 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, p. 2 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Barber Bros. Contracting v. Young 873 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, p. 2 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Brown v. Deal's Carpet Care 867 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Thus, the workers’ compensation judge concluded that, pursuant to Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, p. 2 (La.1/14/94), , Brown was entitled to a legal presumption that the retinal detachment was causally related to the work accident.
  • Thomas v. Wal-Mart 849 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, p. 2 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Crowson v. L & D Community Care 817 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94); .
  • Dawson v. City of Slidell 804 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, pp. 2-3 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Sandidge v. Sandidge 804 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Wilson v. St. Mary Community Action 803 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Landry v. Physicians Practice Management 783 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94); .
  • Beverly v. Boardwalk Const. 771 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The presumption discussed in Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, p. 2 (La.1/14/94), , 691 and states: In Walton[ v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n, Inc., ], this court recognized the existence of a presumption to aid plaintiffs in cases involving a pre-existing condition.
  • Anthony v. BE & K CONST. 760 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), ; Fisher, supra .
  • Oubre v. Union Carbide Corp. 747 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Fisher v. Lincoln Timber Co. 730 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Terry D. Hayes Logging Cont. v. Baxley 715 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Further: Consistent with “the tenet that the worker’s compensation laws are to be liberally construed,” Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al., 93-C-1402 (La.1/14/94), at 3, , the provision is strictly construed against the employer, who is presumed to be in a better position to prevent workplace accidents through its hiring and firing decisions than is the worker, who seldom has the luxury of opting out of the workplace.
  • Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. 708 So. 2d 375 La. 1998
    Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n, Inc. Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-C-1402 (La.1/13/94), .
  • Burlin v. C.D. Montz & Co. 708 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    See also, Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), .
  • McGaughey v. City of New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94); .
  • Ball v. Wilco Marsh Buggies, Inc. 695 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ; Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), ; Kampen v. Conway Southwest Exp., 95-45 (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Apeck Const., Inc. 692 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    23:1221(3)(a); Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al, 93-1402, p. 5-6
  • Livings v. LANGSTON COMPANIES 685 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94); ; Hebert v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., Inc. (La.
  • Lytle v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402, (La.1/14/94), , citing Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n, Inc.
  • Faul v. Bonin 678 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Rhoto v. La. Transmission Parts 670 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Wooley v. EJD Builders, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    1/14/94), ; Penny v. Avondale Container Service, 93-966 (La.App.
  • Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse 668 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Fontenot v. Trans Gulf, Inc. 664 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1/14/94); ; Thomas v. Tony's Seafood, Ltd., (La.App.
  • Lolan v. Louisiana Industries 664 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    1/14/94), ; Glascock v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 25677 (La.App.
  • Ferrier v. Jordache-Ditto's 662 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Warren v. Progressive Healthcare Providers 664 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1/14/94), , the Louisiana Supreme court stated: In addition to compensation benefits for the disability itself, the Louisiana Worker’s Compensation law also provides for the recovery of supplemental earnings benefits to compensate the employee for loss of earning capacity.
  • Williams v. Fibrebond Corp. 661 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Smith v. Morehouse General Hosp. 658 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Followed Kampen v. Conway Southwest Exp. 655 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • Pitre v. Oilfield Production Contractors 651 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Carter v. New Orleans Fire Dept. 646 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    | nWe conclude that it does not, and not only because the worker’s compensation laws of this state are to be liberally construed, see Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al., but because we construe the term “dispute” to mean a disagreement between two or more persons expressing contrary positions.
  • Stutes v. Koch Services, Inc. 649 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc. 646 So. 2d 330 La. 1994
  • Vincent v. Justiss Oil Co., Inc. 649 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co. 644 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    1/14/94), at 3, , the provision is strictly construed against the employer, who is presumed to be in a better position to prevent workplace accidents through its hiring and firing decisions than is the *426 worker, who seldom has the luxury of opting out of the workplace.
  • Pickett v. Stine Lumber Co. 640 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    1/14/94), at 3, , the provision is strictly construed against the employer, who is presumed to be in a better position to prevent workplace accidents through its hiring and firing decisions than is the worker, who seldom has the luxury of opting out of the workplace.
  • Jacobs v. B & H Builders 640 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Penny v. Avondale Container Service 636 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    BURDEN OF PROOF CAUSATION: The Louisiana Supreme Court recently explained the burden of proving causation between the accident and the disabling condition in Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al., : An employee in a worker's compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the accident and the subsequent disabling condition.
  • Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections 633 So. 2d 129 La. 1994
    23:1221(3)(a); Peveto v. WHC Contractors, et al, 93-1402, p. 5-6