Ralston v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
Ralston v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 625 So. 2d 156 (La. 1993).
Cited by
- Dinh Ho v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Ho v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 862 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Edwards v. Daugherty 776 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Ledet v. National Car Rental System, Inc. 694 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Opinion text
625 So.2d 156 (1993) James G. RALSTON, M.D. and Evelyn Darise Ralston v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 93-C-1519. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 1, 1993. PER CURIAM. Granted. There are genuine issues of material fact in this case such as whether plaintiff is in fact infertile, the cause of the infertility, *157 whether such infertility is a sickness under the policy, whether in vitro fertilization is a treatment, and whether the treatment was necessary or essential. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, as affirmed by the court of appeal, is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. REVERSED AND REMANDED. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.