DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hutchinson v. Patel, 637 So. 2d 415.

85 citing documents.

  • Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 92-3086, p. 14 (La.4/28/94), ; see also Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156, p. 5 (La.5/23/94), , and cases cited therein.
  • Potier v. Commissioner of Ins. 753 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Asserting that the provisions of the MMA limit the liability of health care providers in derogation of the general rights of tort victims, the plaintiffs cite Hutchinson *311 v. Patel, 93-2156, p. 5 (La.5/23/94), , and Williams v. St.
  • Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 748 So. 2d 399 La. 1999
  • Garnica v. LA STATE UNIV. MEDICAL CENTER 744 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the Medical Malpractice *160 Act did not apply to the health care provider where the defendant psychiatrist allegedly failed to inform the plaintiff of her husband's threat to cause her injury.
  • Yokem v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCARNATE 742 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Berthelot v. Travelers Insurance Co. 735 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    “[LJegislation is a solemn expression of legislative will, therefore!]] interpretation of a law is primarily the search for the legislature’s intent.” Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), (citing La.C.C.
  • City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum 739 So. 2d 748 La. 1999
  • Trahan v. McManus 728 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
    a case in which a health care provider committed a tort against a person who was not his patient, this court noted that while the Medical Malpractice Act applies exclusively to claims arising from injury to or death of a patient, the claimant need not be a patient, and non-patient claimants may include
  • Armand v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN 729 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See, e.g., Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94)
  • Bolden v. Dunaway 727 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156, p. 3-4 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Bellard v. Grey Wolf Drilling 722 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance 720 So. 2d 1186 La. 1998
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94); .
  • Conerly v. State 714 So. 2d 709 La. 1998
    Ruiz v. Oniate, 97-2412, p. 4 (La.5/19/98), ; Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142, p. 9 (La.2/25/94), ; Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156, p. 5 (La.5/23/94), (holding similarly with respect to the private medical malpractice provisions).
  • Jones v. Scriber 716 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Citing Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), , Jones argued and the trial court agreed that the Act applies “exclusively to claims arising from injuries to or death of a 'patient,” whether those claims are brought by the |2patients themselves, by their representatives on the patient’s behalf, or by “other persons with claims arising from injuries to or death of
  • Clark v. Baird 714 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    In Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 p. 6 (La.5/23/94), , the Supreme Court refers to "the legislature's recognition of the traditional rule of law allowing recovery for medical malpractice only where a physician-patient relationship exists as the result of an express or implied contract and where the physician breaches either the contract or his or her professional d
  • Ruiz v. Oniate 713 So. 2d 442 La. 1998
    Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142, p. 9 (La.2/25/94), ; Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156, p. 5 (La.5/23/94), (holding similarly with respect to the Medical Malpractice Act).
  • Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. Foster 711 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
    Louisiana Smoked Products, Inc. v. Savoie's Sausage and Food Products, Inc., 96-1716 (La.7/1/97), ; Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Dugas v. Durr 707 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94); .
  • Dunn v. Bryant 701 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), .
  • La. Smoked Products v. Savoie's Sausage 696 So. 2d 1373 La. 1997
  • Hebert v. Federal Express Corp. 695 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    More recently, in Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94) , the Supreme Court summarized as follows: Construing the definition of "malpractice" in the context of the foregoing provisions, we conclude the legislature clearly intended to codify the traditional rule in medical malpractice actions requiring either a physician's breach of the express or implied contract between h
  • Price v. City of Bossier City 693 So. 2d 1169 La. 1997
    "The Act applies solely to claims `arising from medical malpractice.'" (citing La.
  • Fincher v. State, Dept. of Health & Hosp. 691 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Trahan v. McManus 689 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94); ; La.R.S.
  • McCrory v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. SERV. 686 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Price v. City of Bossier 680 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Pena v. Fann 677 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Turner v. Kinder Corp. 673 So. 2d 601 La. 1996
  • Hidalgo v. Wilson Certified Exp., Inc. 676 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State ex rel. Department of Social Services ex rel. Harden v. Southern Baptist Hospital 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Charrier v. Charrier 653 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • In re C.B. 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
  • In Re CB, Applying for Adoption 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994